Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.

"Dono" <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1182751308.960967.6540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 24, 6:23 pm, "Jeckyl" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is NOT given by definition,
Yes .. it is
Well, one day you will finally get it . Maybe.
I do
Not yet, obviously.

yes .. obviously.

to solve this problem one need to calculate.
No .. we don't
One day you might get it, it is a little subtler than your level of
understanding.
Condescending prick
Now, now , you are getting abusive again. Every time you are proven
wrong you start swearing.

I've not been proven wrong yet

It will take you some time to realise your
errors in understanding and solving the problem.

I have none .. but I have pointed out youyrs .. you're too arogant to see it
(as you've proven previously)

Hopefully it will
come to you, otherwise, despite all your good intentions to be a
defender of relativity, you still have a lot to learn.

NSorry.. but you are just wrong on this .. you do one frame jump without a
transform and one transform without a frame jump

Fortunately they blanace out and you end up with the right answer by luck
rather than actual correct application.

I did my best to explain it to you, maybe someone else
will manage better. Or maybe you will think more oon your own and
you'll get it.
Unlike you.
I understand it perfectly .. you have it all backwards .. really .. you
just
don't know SR or how to correctly apply it.
Hmmm,coming from someone that thinks that c=const can be deduced from
the Lorentz transforms....this is very funny.

Coming from you, who doens't understand enough t oknow that it can .. that
is even funnier

Repeating the same slogan doesn't get you to learn the real meaning of
SR. Review the exchanges, you might "get it". Give it a few months.

You'll never "get it" .. you're too full of your own self worth

Really .. you should have learnt the first time you made a fool of yourself
... now you're doing it again.

Would you like me to point out the two error you made in your supposed
solution .. or don't you want to be embarrassed again?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Please stop the personal attacks
    ... what someone says to them the first time. ... Repeating it over and over to them ... will not give them further understanding, and will only make you into a fool ... Steve is usually close behind him with a few ill-chosen ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Bad Music
    ... > Understanding is a necessary condition for enjoyment. ... You could read or hear a Chinese poem any number of times, ... > Normally we greet any new piece with partial comprehension. ... > substantial piece of Beethoven he or she heard the first time out. ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: about dispatch tables
    ... Order Perl book online for free, ... By far, my first time through, I ... Having a good understanding of references will certainly help, ...
    (perl.beginners)
  • Re: A day with a Chinese engineer
    ... He seeing it for the first time and me seeing ... them for years but never really understanding the finer points. ... I saw patents going back to 1928 or so on that technology. ... my employer expects me to treat him like any other employee. ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: REINSTALLING WINDOWS XP ON NEW HARDRIVE
    ... First - your understanding is wrong. ... *If* you want to start over again clean, install ... it will go through on the net just as the first time ... transferred to a new hard disk, use a clone copying tool - what I use ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)