Re: black hole radius question please
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:01:47 -0700
Dear Faye Kane:
"Faye Kane" <fayekanegallery@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183136466.726442.159310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In a different post, someone said that black holes are
macroscopic and not subject to quantum effects.
Well, charge and gravitation "make it out", so I don't know how
true that is.
How can the be? I thought the radius decreased
continually due to unending collapse. (I am not
talking about the radius of the event horizon). If
a black hole continues to shrink, won't it become
smaller than a quark or a string?
Try and use a different term for the matter / energy contained
with the event horizon. "Black hole" includes the event
horizon...
Yes it is believed that it all collapses to a central
singularity.
How long will that take?
Depends on a number of things. Fractions of a second most
likely, if there is a central singulartiy, and the black hole is
small.
And if not, what keeps it from shrinking further?
That is why it is called a singlarity.
I know that space
.... spaceTIME ...
is bent almost 90 degrees next to a mass this dense,
but I would think that the definition of the spatial extent
of a black hole would still have some meaning.
It does... "the event horizon". Beyond this, we only have
"central singularity".
David A. Smith
.
- References:
- black hole radius question please
- From: Faye Kane
- black hole radius question please
- Prev by Date: Re: Mass formation, a question of speed?
- Next by Date: Re: GR support for a preferred frame
- Previous by thread: Re: black hole radius question please
- Next by thread: Re: black hole radius question please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|