Re: Proper quantities in SR

On Jun 29, 3:53 pm, Shubee <e.shu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

For a modern derivation of the Lorentz transformation in terms of
'proper' velocity, see

No.

Your derivation is crap, doesn't work in 3+1 dimensions, and makes no
mention of the invariants or energy/momentum.

http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf

Shubee

References:
- Proper quantities in SR
  - From: Stephen Riley
- Re: Proper quantities in SR
  - From: Shubee

Relevant Pages

Re: For crying out loud...BRING BACK THE DALEKS AND GALLIFREY!!!!!
... I'm thoroughly pissed-off with this 'alternate dimensions' crap. ... It seems you can do anything you like in this dimension, cos if anything ... residents of these dimensions to travel between them - he couldn't save ...
(rec.arts.drwho)
Re: A Pie Pan Interaction to Define All Interaction
... > Without apriori of the three dimensions of energy originally found the ... [snip more crap] ...
(sci.physics)
Re: 6x6x1/4" plywood, or similar?
... They had one built 20 years ago, but dimensions are such that some of the ... plywood together. ... It looks like crap. ... Just get a bunch of long pipe for your pipe clamps, ...
(rec.woodworking)
Re: Quantum Gravity 102.6: 11 Dimensions From r^2 = t in F = kq1q2/r^2
... "If the units don't match the equation is crap" - Albert Egnagle, ... dimensions T1, T2, we now have 11 dimensions: ... nuclear, weak nuclear. ...
(sci.physics)
Re: why is euclidean geometry so important?
... > dimensions) is a study of invariants of the groups of rigid motions of the ... > plane. ...
(sci.physics.research)