sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: John M. Dlugosz
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: variable
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: variable
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: quantum mechanics makes perfect sense
  • From: Androcles
• Critcism, Zee's QFT, (KST)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: Igor
• Re: time reversal
  • From: mathematician
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: PD
• Re: quantum mechanics makes perfect sense
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: relativity predicts absurdities - time travel
  • From: Paolo
• Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Sue...
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
  • From: PD
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: Dono
• Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: John M. Dlugosz
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Jean Paul
• Eureka! Unified Quantum Field Theory FINALLY RESOLVED!!!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: YBM
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: PD
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: PD
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: variable
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: variable
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: quantum mechanics makes perfect sense
  • From: Igor
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: variable
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: variable
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: variable
• entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: variable
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: variable
• Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• quantum mechanics makes perfect sense
  • From: variable
• quantum mechanics makes perfect sense
  • From: variable
• Re: time reversal
  • From: variable
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: variable
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: deejey
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: deejey
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: deejey
• Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
  • From: PD
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: PD
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened to HAMMOND?
  • From: computer slut
• Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Alen
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Mind Control and Directed Energy Weapons
  • From: soleilmavis
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Vahagn
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Rigged Hilbert Spaces
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: deejey
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: deejey
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: deejey
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: deejey
• Re: Electron doesn't obey the right hand rule here???
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron doesn't obey the right hand rule here???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Electron doesn't obey the right hand rule here???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: deejey
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: deejey
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: deejey
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: deejey
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: Randy Poe
• what makes electrons fly and not staying still?
  • From: jaydee
• Re: is gravity really physical geometry or only an interpretation
  • From: jaydee
• is gravity really physical geometry or only an interpretation
  • From: jaydee
• are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: jaydee
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reality blinks on and off, why not?
  • From: John Park
• Re: Einstein's leadership
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: jaydee
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Einstein's leadership
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Einstein's leadership
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: jaydee
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: jaydee
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: time reversal
  • From: jaydee
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: jaydee
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: jaydee
• Re: Faraday's law review
  • From: volta
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: volta
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: volta
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: volta
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: volta
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: 7g56f45df
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: 7g56f45df
• Re: Rigged Hilbert Spaces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Rigged Hilbert Spaces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Rigged Hilbert Spaces
  • From: Pmb
• Rigged Hilbert Spaces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Gesetzbericht Faraday
  • From: ÖÇÈôÍøÎÄ
• Rassegna di legge del Faraday
  • From: ÖÇÈôÍøÎÄ
• Revisi¨®n de la ley de Faraday
  • From: ÖÇÈôÍøÎÄ
• Revis?o da lei de Faraday
  • From: ÖÇÈôÍøÎÄ
• Revue de la loi de Faraday
  • From: ÖÇÈôÍøÎÄ
• Re: Electron doesn't obey the right hand rule here???
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Faraday's law review
  • From: ÖÇÈôÍøÎÄ
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: Dono
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Electron doesn't obey the right hand rule here???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why light is electromagnetic when she dont act like an electromagnet?
  • From: Igor
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: Igor
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Pmb
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Pmb
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron doesn't obey the right hand rule here???
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron doesn't obey the right hand rule here???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Electron doesn't obey the right hand rule here???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Jeckyl
• are the Space-time dimensions continuous or discrete?
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: why speed of light is not constant?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: time reversal
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: C,Felis
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: C,Felis
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: jcon
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: C.Felis
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: C.Felis
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: OG
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: C.Felis
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: OG
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: FIT from SPF, by KST.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help! motion of a charged particle in a B field.
  • From: RandomGuy
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: harry
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Help! motion of a charged particle in a B field.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Help! motion of a charged particle in a B field.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Isn't Einstein's gamma function wrong?
  • From: roger
• Re: Help! motion of a charged particle in a B field.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Sue...
• Help! motion of a charged particle in a B field.
  • From: unimatrice0
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: roger
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity predicts absurdities - time travel
  • From: roger
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's derived mathematical equation for Newton's 200 years old perception, of conversion of light energy to mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: time reversal
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Einstein’s derived mathematical equation for Newton’s 200 years old perception, of conversion of light energy to mass
  • From: fleesow
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is more intelligent & not a novice.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Eric Gisse is more intelligent & not a novice.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Light intensity does not mean multiple photons
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Traveler
• Re: acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: OG
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: OG
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: time reversal
  • From: xxein
• acceleration and Lorentz transformation
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Tom Roberts
• In brief: F=qv x B is an interaction of TWO MAGNETIC FIELDS
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Traveler
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: OG
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: OG
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: FIT from SPF, by KST.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: OG
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Can we mark the points of "empty" space ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• FIT from SPF, by KST.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: harry
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Igor
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: what is a space-time
  • From: erach27@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: instantaneous communication and infinite speed
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: instantaneous communication and infinite speed
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Randy is calling me a liar
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: harry
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: harry
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Phil
• Re: The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• The end of SR (Second post.)
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: instantaneous communication and infinite speed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Phil
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: EMF generated by TWO MAGNETIC FORCES
  • From: jcon
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Randy Poe
• Is electron's spin same direction as it's magnetic field
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: EMF generated by TWO MAGNETIC FORCES
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse was hit by a hammer on the head
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are Relativists Zombies?
  • From: stefanbanev@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetic Force generates electricity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Rest mass
  • From: bz
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: harry
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Shubee
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: Dono
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: mathematician
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: jem
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Erica Gisse is liar and a Novice
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse was hit by a hammer on the head
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Phil
• Re: Eric Gisse was hit by a hammer on the head
  • From: vanep
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Shubee
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Dono
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Phil
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Phil
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Phil
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: EMF generated by TWO MAGNETIC FORCES
  • From: jcon
• Re: What happened to HAMMOND?
  • From: jcon
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Hayek
• Re: GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Androcles
• GR support for a preferred frame 2
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Erica Gisse is liar and a Novice
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Eric Gisse was hit by a hammer on the head
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Practically all in this newsgroup lack intelligence
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: jem
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: jem
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Henrik Pedersen
• Re: Eric Gisse was hit by a hammer on the head
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Juan R.
• Curvature vs matter by KST
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Eric Gisse was hit by a hammer on the head
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Space-time confusion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Space-time confusion
  • From: Phil
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetic Force generates electricity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Isn't Einstein's gamma function wrong?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Paradox: stars revolving earth in 24 hours
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: No more black holes? (To appear in Phys Rev D)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No more black holes? (To appear in Phys Rev D)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetic Force generates electricity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rest mass
  • From: valls
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: G
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: G
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: G
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: EMF generated by TWO MAGNETIC FORCES
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Paradox: stars revolving earth in 24 hours
  • From: ongeluk
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what other good theories?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what other good theories?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: why faster then light speeds violate causality and speed of sound doesnt?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: Dono
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Do you agree with this about Einstein and SR
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: harry
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: harry
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: jem
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: jem
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: jem
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Isn't Einstein's gamma function wrong?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Isn't Einstein's gamma function wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: harry
• Re: Bunch of corrections (multipart message)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Anisotropy of space / Shnoll et al. results...
  • From: harry
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Isn't Einstein's gamma function wrong?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: how much fuel my spaceship needs?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Isn't Einstein's gamma function wrong?
  • From: roger
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Michelson Morley experiment with sound waves
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl