Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- From: mgconsolidated@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 09:49:45 -0700
On 2 Jul, 17:14, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 2, 11:27 am, mgconsolida...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2 Jul, 16:07, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
First they say farther objects are more redshifted then they say they
are less redshifted than much closer objects EQUALS a very LARGE
MARGIN OF OBSERVATION ERROR.
***For the above reason***, it would be difficult to believe these
same scientist that say the Universe is expaning uniformily in all
directions. And if possibly it isn't expanding uniformily then it
would be possible to determine "WHERE" the big bang occured.
Look at it this way....
The big bang theory (by its very definition) can only go back to the
point at which the universe had already expanded to a size larger than
plank's length (approx 1.6 x 10^-36 metres), which occurred around
10^-41 seconds after the unknowable event of the actual big bang.
(Numbers from memory - don't flame me it they're not perfect!)
Given that everything in the universe began from this point and
expanded, then you can say that the big bang occurred everywhere in
the universe. If you want more evidence, then we're still receiving
the afterglow of this event in the form of the cosmic microwave
background, which is equally observable from all directions.
Denying the above affirmation and who's only response is by digging
into another kettle of soup is not proper.
And who says there cannot also be the very *SAME* discrepancies in
homogenous observation errors with the CMBR.
We know light shifts frequencies and yet we deny such possibilities
for the CMBR. So many starligths that surround us, what happened to
yesterday starlight that hit earth and other planets, and the day
before that, and the day before that, and the day before that, and the
day before that....the low kelvins might be an attribuable clue.
LARGE planetary rings but a few feet from their very nose (as compared
to far-off objects) and they only noticed them recently.
Regards
Matt- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not sure where you're going with this... doplar shifts are fully part
of the the explanation for CMBR (not totally - expansion also plays a
part). That's why CMBR is in the milimetre wavelength and not in the
visible wavelength.
Anyway - my last post on the subject; I'll let someone else have a go
TTFN
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- References:
- Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- From: mgconsolidated
- Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- Prev by Date: Re: 9.8m/sec^2 Coordinate Acceleration in GR
- Next by Date: Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- Previous by thread: Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- Next by thread: Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
