Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:12:17 +1000
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1Sjii.16683$2v1.8259@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mgconsolidated@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Can anyone provide / point to a definitive answer on whether Lorentz
contractions are physical or an observered effect.
This depends on what you mean by those words.
Here's an analogy: a ladder will fit through a doorway if it is oriented
correctly
Hey .. that's the same example I gave :)
.
- References:
- So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- From: mgconsolidated
- Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- From: Tom Roberts
- So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- Prev by Date: Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- Next by Date: Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
- Previous by thread: Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- Next by thread: Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading