Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured

On Jul 2, 4:20 pm, wolfgang <e6k8s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 2, 9:54 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Jul 2, 10:07 am, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

First they say farther objects are more redshifted then they say they
are less redshifted than much closer objects

The statement following "then" is NOT what "they" say at all. What is
true is that farther objects are still more redshifted than closer
objects, but just not quite as much as would be expected from a
straight-line relationship between distance and redshift. That's a
much different statement than what you just said.

EQUALS a very LARGE
MARGIN OF OBSERVATION ERROR.

***For the above reason***, it would be difficult to believe these
same scientist that say the Universe is expaning uniformily in all
directions. And if possibly it isn't expanding uniformily then it
would be possible to determine "WHERE" the big bang occured.

and why not linear?

and not progressive if it is accelerating?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hubble would have noticed the farthest start less redshifted than the
closest star, instead he noticed vice-versa.
They're saying only data from the farthest stars are inconsitant with
Hubble's observations, the closer stars are still consistant.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
    ... true is that farther objects are still more redshifted than closer ... straight-line relationship between distance and redshift. ... less in the present and not more ...thus the expansion RATE is less. ... the second at 160 km/sec. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
    ... true is that farther objects are still more redshifted than closer ... straight-line relationship between distance and redshift. ... What may be confusing you is that the expansion rate is not how fast ... And THAT number is smaller for more distant ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Anyone know how Hubble could be very wrong?
    ... redshift increases with distance seems to be less out ... objects than for closer objects" to be "the RED-SHIFT ... No. Farther supernovas are more redshifted. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Perhaps still possible to determine where the big bang occured
    ... true is that farther objects are still more redshifted than closer ... straight-line relationship between distance and redshift. ... "What is true is that farther objects are still "moving away" more ... less in the present and not more ...thus the expansion RATE is less. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)