Re: Due to Hubble's mistake perhaps still possible to determine Big Bang's origin



http://www.womanastronomer.com/hleavitt.htm

http://www.mada.org.il/website/html/eng/2_1_1-31.htm

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entries/baleav.html

http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/people/leavitt.html&edu=high

http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9047538/Henrietta-Swan-Leavitt


--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!



<guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183469280.109207.91350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Regardless of large versus small margin of Hubble's observation error:

Case and point: Hubble determined from his observations that the
expansion rate was slowing down, in 1998 they determined the very
opposite.

For the above reason, there may ALSO BE ERRORS in the uniformity of
the expansion rate.....and coupled with the possibility of a non-
euclidean bent space would give a copernican REVERSE observation
error.

By "REVERSE COPERNICAN" meaning STRAIGHT light traveling the horizon
towards New York would not come from a star but instead would come
from a city at the opposite side of the Earth.(In this case though, we
are speaking about light crossing the Universe instead of Earth)

Thus for far distant light that which would be straight may actually
be bent light, the bending would affect our readings from what is a
uniform expansion.



.