Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:38:51 -0000
On Jul 4, 2:20 pm, Surfer <sur...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
An absolute frame is then defined to be a frame in which the reading
is zero.
I have news for you. Not only is the presumption of an absolute
rest frame inconsistent with special relativity, ...
You haven't shown that is the case.
You have got to be shitting me.
-- Surfer
.
- References:
- Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- From: Bilge
- Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- From: Surfer
- Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- From: Bilge
- Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- From: Surfer
- Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- From: Bilge
- Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- From: Surfer
- Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- Prev by Date: Re: Some remark about SRT.
- Next by Date: Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- Previous by thread: Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- Next by thread: Re: QM support for a preferred frame
- Index(es):