Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- From: The TimeLord <mathnphysics-not@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:37:57 -0500
Don Stockbauer wrote:
On Jul 4, 1:47 am, The TimeLord <mathnphysics-...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>[...]
wrote:
Don Stockbauer wrote:
OK. Nice to see that one boxed for all time.
Thanks.
Gosh, relativity is complicated. Almost like tea leaves. Ya makes
Actually, after I got a hold of some good books and good classes, it
turned out not to be too complicated. Essentially the philosophy of
Newton still holds, just that you have to be aware that there is a
greater existence than flat space.
your observation, ya makes your interpretation. Of course, a true
theory of relativity would handle all relationships, even human ones,
[smile] Let's not get carried away now, shall we?
even those between any two concepts (say, that of the meme of Jack
Benny's left little toenail and the meme of President Bush's delusion
that simplistic thinking would procure oil from Iraq seamlessly).
Yes?
I'll stick to equations and stars. [smile]
--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!
.
- References:
- Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- From: OG
- Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- From: The TimeLord
- Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- Prev by Date: Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- Next by Date: Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- Previous by thread: Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- Next by thread: Re: red shifting the edge of the universe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
