Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?

On Jul 6, 12:01 pm, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dono wrote:
On Jul 5, 9:55 pm, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In LET, motion relative to the ether causes objects to
contract

The "object contraction" from Lorentz 1904 paper has been falsified by
several experiments[...]

You are confused. LET includes more than just "object contraction" --
it includes time dilation and relativity of simultaneity, just like SR;

Tom,

I showed you quite clearly why CURRENT versions of LET cannot include
"object contraction" since "object contraction" has been already
falsified by the listed experiments. Please read my post again.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR, frames, light and spatial separation
    ... And come back with a coherent definition for inertial frame. ... comparisson of time dilation. ... "Simultaneity is easily defined in the absolute sense by reverse ... relativity of simultaneity DISAPPEARS. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR, frames, light and spatial separation
    ... And come back with a coherent definition for inertial frame.. ... comparisson of time dilation. ... "Simultaneity is easily defined in the absolute sense by reverse ... relativity of simultaneity DISAPPEARS. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
    ... It would be EXACTLY the same as having SR with only length contraction and ... not time dilation and relativity of simultaneity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: re:Can Light Propagate without Space??
    ... time dilation factor" but you don't specify it. ... No, matter, not space. ... > contract if space does not contract. ... >> to time rates, it is only a quantity and not a time rate. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: re:Can Light Propagate without Space??
    ... time dilation factor" but you don't specify it. ... No, matter, not space. ... > contract if space does not contract. ... >> to time rates, it is only a quantity and not a time rate. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading