Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:21:16 +1000
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1184372408.826469.14600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 13, 8:46 pm, cosmo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
So I take it that nobody openly supports the idea that the earth bound
twin physically ages at a faster rate than the traveler and that this
only occurs during acceleration following turn around?
I like to think - although having been the recipient of a high school
drop kick as the result of my lazy and disruptive attitude and being
mathematically challenged to the extreme with an almost non-existent
education in the subject of physics - that my challenge to that
attempted negation of the paradox was successful.
Bill
It is difficult to accept any sort of *diffential ageing*
when you consider twins must agree on some
periodic process in common view, such as
the number of orbits made by Jupiter's moons.
No .. they won't.
They will see it happening at a different rate
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- References:
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: cosmosco
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Sue...
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- Prev by Date: Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- Next by Date: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading