Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: "Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS123@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:42:33 +0100
"Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:f7opop$ci0$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1184872786.022264.234720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 19, 8:57 am, stevendaryl3...@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
wrote:
You can't *measure* that effect because light does
not move like a bullet. There is no such effeft,
calculated nor measured.
You've missed the whole point...
As always.
--
Martin Hogbin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- References:
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: cosmosco
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Jeckyl
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- Prev by Date: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by Date: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Index(es):