Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill <cosmosco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:30:48 -0700
On Jul 21, 10:02 am, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"bill" <cosmo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1184974883.341529.254740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
According to SR, if one clock is made to move relatively to another
clock the moving clock will tick over at a faster rate than the
stationary clock
Was that a typo? .. a moving clock always ticks slower from the iFoR of the
'stationary' observer.
Sorry, yes it was a typo. Thanks
Bill
.
- References:
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: cosmosco
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Darwin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Jeckyl
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- Prev by Date: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by Date: Re: Rest mass
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by thread: "The Arrow of Time"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
