Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:15:03 +1000
"bill" <cosmosco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1184981064.527191.20310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No I would not. I cannot accept that the traveler *really* believes
that the earth is orbiting the sun at around 1m-s nor do I believe
that this is what would 'really' be happening.
What has the belief of some astronaut got to do with the physics?
During the acceleration the situation is much more
complicated but the answer is essentially the same.
As regards whether it is 'physically' happening, I cannot
answer this question unless you define exactly what you
mean 'physically'.
By 'physically' I mean the concept that the earth is 'really' orbiting
the sun at 1m-s as distinct from 'apparently' as determined by the
traveller.
In the traveller iFoR it is
So he *really* believs that the earth is *physicaly* orbiting the sunIt has nothing whatsoever to do with what *we*, as stay at homeYes, for the traveller.
observers observers, think but what is claimed the *traveler*
determines is reality.
at 1m-s?
It is .. in his iFoR
What we can tell is that, when the two twins meet up, the travelling
twin has aged less than the earthbound twin.
One could argue that inertial clocks run as quickly as possible
and that the best way of describing what has happened is
to say that the non-inertial (travelling) twin's clock has been
slowed down.
Other than what one 'could argue' I fully agree with those comments
but I cannot agree, as expressed above, that the stay at home
*physically* ages at the faster rate thus that the traveler could
obliterate all life on earth by taking his foot off the gas pedal.
You need to define 'physically'.
That the traveler destroys all life on the planet.
He destroys nothing .. it just happens over the long period of time that
elapses on the earth
When he returns
home he learns - hopefully - that this has not *physically* taken
place.
But it has
The fact that the traveler finds on his return that everything is
'normal' back here - that life continues - should indicate to him that
the earth had *not* been orbiting the sun at near light speed, that
what he saw or determined was nothing more than a visual illusion
generated by his rate of travel.
No, it indicates that the passage of time is not universal. Of course,
on his return, the traveller will be aware that, from the earthbound
twin's point of view, nothing unusual has happened.
Having 'believed' that all life on the planet has been obliterated it
would not only be 'from the earthbound twin's point of view, nothing
unusual has happened' but also from the *traveler's* point of view.
It really happens
The bit you have not grasped is that the passage of time is not
universal. This is very counterintuitive but it is the inescapable
conclusion of experiment.
Or rather, in the *interpretations* of those experiments. As far as I
am aware there has been no experiment which proved that from the
traveler's point of view it is his twin that ages at the faster rate
than himself.
Time dilation is experimentally proven .. time goes slower for moving
objects.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- References:
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: cosmosco
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- Prev by Date: Re: So... Lerentz Contractions are *physical* not observered?
- Next by Date: Re: E=F/q=vB Magnetic Force does not work on the charge
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|