Re: Speed of Light with Expanding Universe?


"Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" <ahmed.ouahi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f7t261$ed4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Bpfoi.8072$jL.5206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Ahmed Ouahi, Architect:

"Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" <ahmed.ouahi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:f7ru71$tj7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

... A charming my dear, unfortunately would not
adress the point!

In simple lamgauge, without your usual floral writing, what
was
your point?

Yes, indeed!

However, what would be, could be more appropriate
along that matter, as it sounds, that it is the natural
as the nature behaviors, for the simple reason, that
the universe which could expand too fast is a
definitely out of any ability to aggregate an
appropriate knowledge, first of all, about itself as
about its behaviors, as also an appropriate useful
material along as for the galaxies and the stars,
because even a building this complex life could not
be made, neither.

"Attempted translation"
If the Universe expanded too fast, life would not be possible.

Therefore, along the following contradiction,
concerning the universe which could expand too
slowly, something which a definitely would end up
making the universe collapsing along an absolute
contraction, all along, as even before those billions
of years needed, for instance, along a simply the
stars and the planets to be formed, all along, and
this is what is all about, a definitely as a matter a fact.

"Attempted translation"
If the Universe expanded too slowly, it would have collapsed.
What we have seems to be the only path to produce what we see
around us.

What did this have to do with the OP's question? Do you feel the
"speed of light" to be part-and-parcel with expansion, like the
sting of a ball intercepted by a head?

David A. Smith


.

Relevant Pages