Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:29:54 -0700
Dear Sue:
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1185154911.540622.282240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 22, 10:03 pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <d...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
[...]
And aren't those observations (determinations)
nothing more than visual illusions generated by
the red shift and blue shift of the light from the
planet?
Problem is, if you total up the number of such full orbits, it
will agree with the stay-at-home's age, and not the
traveller's
age.
The traveler's *age* is not an issue.
Absolutely true.
If Stella's hair differs significantlly from Terra's
then the priniciple of relativity has been violated.
Sorry, no. And you proceed to posture yet again.
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- References:
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: cosmosco
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Sue...
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- Prev by Date: Re: Isn't Einstein's gamma function wrong?
- Next by Date: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|