Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:39:11 -0700
On Jul 24, 5:55 am, "Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
[...]
Correct. When we make a measurement of a relatively moving
clock we do exactly the same. We make allowance for all known
effects. _After we have done that_ we find the moving clock to be
ticking more slowly than our own.
In formal electromagnetism we find that retarded time at the emitter
becomes advance time at the absorber. One cancels the other
leaving only the Doppler component. Only if you assume
Newton's inertial light particles can you arrive at such nonsense.
Welcome to the 21st century.
<< Figure 3: The wave impedance measures
the relative strength of electric and magnetic
fields. It is a function of source [absorber] structure. >>
http://www.sm.luth.se/~urban/master/Theory/3.html
Formerly: http://www.conformity.com/0102reflections.html
Propagation in a dielectric medium
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node98.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_impedance
Time-independent Maxwell equations
Time-dependent Maxwell's equations
Relativity and electromagnetism
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/lectures.html
Maxwell's equations in classic electrodynamics
(classic field theory)_
a) Maxwell equations (no movement),
b) Maxwell equations (with moved bodies)
http://www.wolfram-stanek.de/maxwell_equations.htm#maxwell_classic_extended
Sue...
.
- References:
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: cosmosco
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- Prev by Date: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by Date: Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|