Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:23:28 -0700
On Jul 30, 2:24 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 30, 12:37 pm, "gu...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <gu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 30, 12:50 pm, "Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<gu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1185813270.920218.168100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Correct?
Look it up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_scalar
Therefore it is correct that Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant
scalar are not the same thing?
That's correct, they are not the same thing. "Scalar" tells you how
many quantities are needed to describe it (1),
The web link above "specificaly says" a lorentz scalar is invariant,
meaning it cannot be the opposite of invariant.
and "invariant" tells
you how that quantity depends on the choice of reference frame.
An "apple" and a "green apple" are not the same thing.
PD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
- From: PD
- Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
- Prev by Date: Re: Temperature is not Lorentz invariant
- Next by Date: Re: On spherical gravitational collapse and the stability of classical black holes.
- Previous by thread: Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
- Next by thread: Re: Lorentz scalar and Lorentz invariant scalar are not the same thing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|