Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:34:45 +1000
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1185868592.894035.32570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 30, 9:40 am, "papar...@xxxxxxxxx" <papar...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
[...]Bill
In any physical experiment, the observer measurements
are bound by the
instruments and frames of reference. In the twin's thought experiment,
acceleration is not needed to explain the result (a simple x-t diagram
will make everything quite clear). Of course, acceleration and braking
will help both twins to determine who is really making the travel, but
has nothing to do with the clocks reading different when the travel
ends.
Reference frames are imaginary so they don't affect
instruments.
No .. they let you measure and observe them
[snip more crap from Sue]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- References:
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
- Next by Date: Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|