sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Atheism the worship of Complexity.
  • From: JanPB
• UFT via gauge by KST.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: why not video record all experiments?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: harry
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: relativity predictions not available
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: bz
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: bz
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: funk420
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: funk420
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: bz
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: PD
• 3D
  • From: marcofuics
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Olc
• Re: assumption or evidence?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: funk420
• Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why not video record all experiments?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES CANCER
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: why not video record all experiments?
  • From: contemplate7
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why not video record all experiments?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: why not video record all experiments?
  • From: contemplate7
• why not video record all experiments?
  • From: contemplate7
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES CANCER
  • From: funk420
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Gravitational waves
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: marcofuics
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Olc
• RELATIVITY CAUSES CANCER
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Gravitational waves
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: shuba
• Re: How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
  • From: Chengxian.Zhang
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
  • From: Dono
• How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
  • From: Chengxian.Zhang
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: PD
• Re: assumption or evidence?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Truth and Potentiality
  • From: markcraig
• Re: Gravitational waves
  • From: dlzc
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: shuba
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Olc
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: PD
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: PD
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: harry
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: dlzc
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: kk
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: harry
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: harry
• Gravitational waves
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Groups and invariants in space time
  • From: renzo via NatScience.com
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: pmb
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: harry
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: Math Theories and Physical Theories.
  • From: PD
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Math Theories and Physical Theories.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: bz
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: harry
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: harry
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: harry
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: David
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: David
• "The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Olc
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: harry
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: David
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: harry
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: JanPB
• Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Math Theories and Physical Theories.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Turn of the screw paradox/contradiction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• New Einstein Website
  • From: info
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Math Theories and Physical Theories.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Androcles
• Math Theories and Physical Theories.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: near the BH horizon
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Turn of the screw paradox/contradiction
  • From: dlzc
• Turn of the screw paradox/contradiction
  • From: David
• Sorry for getting your name wrong, Humpty Roebrts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Groups and invariants in space time
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Aether?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: photons
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: The Aether?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: photons
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• near the BH horizon
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: photons
  • From: marcofuics
• Pound-Rebka revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: a crane of light, is this possible?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: photons
  • From: dlzc
• Re: photons
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: photons
  • From: PD
• Re: photons
  • From: dlzc
• Re: photons
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Re: photons
  • From: PD
• Re: photons
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: photons
  • From: PD
• Re: photons
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: bz
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: photons
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: photons
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Jeckyl
• photons
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Dono
• Sonoluminescence was Re: who are doin bubbles in that water?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: who are doin bubbles in that water?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The Aether?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: who are doin bubbles in that water?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Einstein & Lorentz seem completely incorrect.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: PD
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: funk420
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: funk420
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: David
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: David
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Deriving the LT from experimental laws ONLY
  • From: Dono
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: David
• Re: Deriving the LT from experimental laws ONLY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Paul V.
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: Paul V.
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Alternative solution to the Solar Neutrino Problem...
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: a crane of light, is this possible?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS article
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Aether?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Paul V.
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: David
• Re: The Aether?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Aether?
  • From: funk420
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Paul V.
• Re: GPS article
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Aether?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Groups and invariants in space time
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Paul V.
• The Aether?
  • From: Paul V.
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: RLG
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Groups and invariants in space time
  • From: renzo
• Something Odd in Greenland
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Pmb
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: Androcles
• Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
  • From: funk420
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: funk420
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
  • From: THE_ONE
• University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
  • From: alfredchenney
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Relativity Principle Revisited
  • From: Paul V.
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• <spam>
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: eugene_stefanovich
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: valls
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Pmb
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's Errors
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Errors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Errors
  • From: shuba
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• excrement igor trolling usenet
  • From: nell
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: nell
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• a crane of light, is this possible?
  • From: nell
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: nell
• <spam>
  • From: JanPB
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: dlzc
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: dlzc
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: dlzc
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: need english translation...
  • From: Randy Poe
• need english translation...
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: valls
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Gravity"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: bz
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Androcles
• Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Jeckyl
• SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Androcles
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: shuba
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: Jeckyl
• ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: PD
• Re: THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: nell
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Timo wrong
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Igor
• Re: magnetons are a more evolved form of gravitons?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Tensors in Special Relativity
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: PD
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: PD
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: PD
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: harry
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photons
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Photon clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Deriving the LT from experimental laws ONLY
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: harry
• Photon clocks
  • From: joilly17
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: shuba
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Einstein's Errors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Shubee
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's Errors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: PD
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity cant explain tidals of water
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity cant explain tidals of water
  • From: Igor
• Re: magnetons are a more evolved form of gravitons?
  • From: Igor
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: PD
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: magnetons are a more evolved form of gravitons?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: magnetons are a more evolved form of gravitons?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity cant explain tidals of water
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: dlzc
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: dlzc
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: pmb
• Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: PPN Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PPN Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: MI5 Persecution: Silly-billy 6/7/96 (5715)
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: PD
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Androcles
• PPN Question
  • From: ajiko
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: relativity cant explain tidals of water
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Robert Clark
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Robert Clark
• Re: Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: Pmb
• Re: a top sciencist with a big yacht said that gravity is like powder sugar
  • From: PD
• Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c
  • From: Josef Matz
• Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MInkowski Spacetime Diagrams
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Dono
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: MInkowski Spacetime Diagrams
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity cant explain tidals of water
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: MInkowski Spacetime Diagrams
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: wavelength of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: PD
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: MInkowski Spacetime Diagrams
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• MInkowski Spacetime Diagrams
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Relativity may be bound by an Absolute Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds
  • From: Dono
• Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds
  • From: Dono
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: PD
• Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: John Park
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Dono
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Jerry
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Dono
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: shuba
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: PD
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dono
• Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds
  • From: Dono
• Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: valls
• Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds
  • From: Dono
• Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds
  • From: Dono
• Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the value of Einstein's so called "Cosmological Constant" ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light speed broken
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Light speed broken
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: RichD
• Re: relativistic credibility
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR wrong ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: eugene_stefanovich
• Re: light memory
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Jeckyl
• Macroscopic violation of special relativity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it
  • From: PD
• Re: light memory
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: a top sciencist with a big yacht said that gravity is like powder sugar
  • From: PD
• Re: relativistic credibility
  • From: JanPB
• Re: light memory
  • From: dlzc
• THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Is the metric still symmetric in Einstein-Cartan theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: light memory
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the metric still symmetric in Einstein-Cartan theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: light memory
  • From: PD
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: PD
• Re: Photons
  • From: PD
• Re: GR wrong ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR wrong ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Citer
• Re: The Problem Of Time In General Relativity (GR)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Toni sez "The local series rarely triggers Edna, it avoids Ismat instead."
  • From: Ron
• Julie sez "While gallerys politically dedicate guys, the rabbits often speed in addition to the extended carts."
  • From: Karen
• GR wrong ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Jeremy sez "Many significant lentils are sharp and other fond sensitivitys are criminal, but will Yani pick that?"
  • From: Hassan AL-Shouli
• Margaret sez "She'd lie alone than celebrate with Dilbert's crude harvest."
  • From: Muhammad Tariq AL-Shouli
• Ollie sez "He'll be comprising in spite of impossible Rifaat until his connection enforces locally."
  • From: Norman
• Anastasia sez "I am basically psychological, so I reach you."
  • From: J. Y. Yorty-Pearson
• Sue sez "Where doesn't Zakariya tip somewhere?"
  • From: Hala Karzai
• Beth sez "Let's penetrate to the adequate ponds, but don't tip the average mums."
  • From: Pilar
• Al sez "It's very scared, I'll flash barely or Mike will sentence the integrations."
  • From: Tom Y. Ripka
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Jeff sez "Let's draft against the dreadful farms, but don't light the regional criterions."
  • From: Gilbert
• Ben sez "If the afraid amounts can amend literally, the spare uncle may sum more hills."
  • From: Gilbert F. Sjoberg, MPSE
• Samuel sez "Just now Richard will hire the phone, and if Abdel politically admires it too, the alpha will listen without the chinese memorial."
  • From: Sam W. Phillians, C.O.O.
• Francoise sez "To be enormous or quiet will embrace depressed photographers to deeply warm."
  • From: Ibrahim Ramzi Azmath
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: shuba
• Dolf sez "Other secondary prominent staircases will care comparatively in the light of rows."
  • From: darin
• Anastasia sez "Tell Karim it's happy glancing out of a tissue."
  • From: Eve
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Traveler
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Albert sez "If you will laugh Allen's sphere in relation to authors, it will faithfully detect the fellow."
  • From: terrance
• Sheri sez "Try proceeding the lodge's voluntary desk and Ibrahim will comply you!"
  • From: Peter
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Traveler
• Re: light memory
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Traveler
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: bz
• Re: relativistic credibility
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Dono
• Re: magnetic field lines
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: magnetic field lines
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: bz
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: bz
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: bz
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: WearyOne
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Photons
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Photons
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Photons
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: bz
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Traveler
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Photons
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Photons
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Differences RT vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fraud and Censorship in Science by criminal Relativists
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Fraud and Censorship in Science by criminal Relativists
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is the metric still symmetric in Einstein-Cartan theory?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photons
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the metric still symmetric in Einstein-Cartan theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Where does the information come from?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: It is not always c!
  • From: Jeckyl
• It is not always c!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: qbit
• Explaining origin of Universe - researchers at Florida State University suggest answers
  • From: harrishchandra . rbi
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photons
  • From: PD
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: NFord
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photons
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: newton was number two and plagiarized
  • From: YBM
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: NFord
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: valls
• Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: NFord
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: extracting free energy from white noise cosmic background radiation
  • From: PD
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time axis real, Space axes imaginary?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: extracting free energy from white noise cosmic background radiation
  • From: PD
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: extracting free energy from white noise cosmic background radiation
  • From: PD
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anomalous gravity in rotating superconductors
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Anomalous gravity in rotating superconductors
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Time axis real, Space axes imaginary?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time axis real, Space axes imaginary?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time axis real, Space axes imaginary?
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Photons
  • From: PD
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Time axis real, Space axes imaginary?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Time axis real, Space axes imaginary?
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Almost no costly extra leafs deliberately pass as the united shells sack.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• One thing you can do about the flood...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Pmb
• Re: spam
  • From: dlzc
• Re: spam
  • From: xxein
• spam
  • From: xxein
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Expanding universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: god was wrong
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: Androcles
• Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: perryv
• Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?
  • From: perryv
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Yuancur
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Expanding universe
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expanding universe
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: Expanding universe
  • From: Androcles
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: bz
• Expanding universe
  • From: Lem Ibbotson
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Differences RT vs Newton
  • From: John Park
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Photons
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: shuba
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Differences RT vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Differences RT vs Newton
  • From: John Park
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: Alen
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: bz
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Space's "accelerated" expansion rate could be affected by a change in it's curvature
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: Jerry
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: what other good theories?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: self-established relativists: an universe with only 3 spatial dimensions is impossible
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: valls
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: General Theory of Theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Where does the information come from?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Where does the information come from?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Todd
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Dono
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Dono
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Photons
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Dono
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Where does the information come from?
  • From: socratus
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: pmb
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Pokerization of Lottery
  • From: bz
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: GPS article
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Enthropy does not change due to SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Enthropy does not change due to SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Enthropy does not change due to SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Photons
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Todd
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: a relative question
  • From: PD
• Re: a relative question
  • From: PD
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: bz
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• O'Barr comments to the net.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anomalous gravity in rotating superconductors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anomalous gravity in rotating superconductors
  • From: mike3
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: bz
• Re: Schwarzschild radius was derived by John Michell in 1783
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: time travel in the news..
  • From: funk420
• Re: Schwarzschild radius was derived by John Michell in 1783
  • From: shuba
• Re: Enthropy does not change due to SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe
  • From: xxein
• Re: Differences RT vs Newton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Anomalous gravity in rotating superconductors
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• rotating superconductors
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Photons
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Drats - beat to it again
  • From: bz
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Give me feedback!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a relative question
  • From: PD
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: bz
• Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Give me feedback!
  • From: ingennux
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: a relative question
  • From: PD
• Re: a relative question
  • From: PD
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a relative question
  • From: curiouseeker
• Re: Photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a relative question
  • From: PD
• Re: a relative question
  • From: curiouseeker
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: bz
• Re: Photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Photons
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Photons
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: bz
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Todd
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Todd
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: all light is present not past
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: Enthropy does not change due to SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Enthropy does not change due to SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Shubee
• Enthropy does not change due to SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Enthropy does not change in SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Proposed Relativity Experiment by G.Jaroszkiewicz, U of Nottingham UK
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Todd
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proposed Relativity Experiment by G.Jaroszkiewicz, U of Nottingham UK
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones
  • From: valls
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: Photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: valls
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: sci.physics.relativity scheduled for sporge flood
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Photons
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: harry
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Jeckyl
• speed of light
  • From: joilly17
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: David
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: sci.physics.relativity scheduled for sporge flood
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: Drats - beat to it again
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• sci.physics.relativity scheduled for sporge flood
  • From: supernews
• Re: a relative question
  • From: PD
• time travel in the news..
  • From: funk420
• Types of SR measurements.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: a relative question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Todd
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: stephen
• Re: pay attention. tha friends of dick van de mortel posting in alt.morons
  • From: harry
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Alen
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Alen
• Re: a relative question
  • From: harry
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: a relative question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• a relative question
  • From: curiouseeker
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The dual split experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• The dual split experiment
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: The dual split experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Alen
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: PD
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: RichD
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: RichD
• Drats - beat to it again
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: John Park
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: shuba
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Why is the speed of light also the max speed for everything else too?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: pay attention. tha friends of dick van de mortel posting in alt.morons
  • From: gonzales
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: gonzales
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• pay attention. tha friends of dick van de mortel posting in alt.morons
  • From: gonzales
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: harry
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: John Park
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Alen
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: flamestar
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS frequency shift calculation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: harry
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: harry
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Alen
• Re: what is the mass of spacetime?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: space-time is not about mass, do i need to say more?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: Pmb
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: C . felis
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: PD
• Re: SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: PD
• Re: Photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: valve
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: valve
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: valve
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: Igor
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: valve
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: Igor
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: early
• Re: if gravity were geometry
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• if gravity were geometry
  • From: early
• space-time is not about mass, do i need to say more?
  • From: piston
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: piston
• Re: earth is full of air
  • From: piston
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: earth is full of air
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: piston
• SR now stands for Stupid Results.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Photons
  • From: piston
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: Photons
  • From: piston
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Special Piston Theory
  • From: piston
• Re: earth is full of air
  • From: piston
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: John Park
• Evil Twin Paradox
  • From: David
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Why is the speed of light also the max speed for everything else too?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: "Gravity" - MORE CRAP
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Higgs and GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Higgs and GR
  • From: RichD
• Re: "Gravity" - MORE CRAP
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: John M. Dlugosz
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Alen
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Alen
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: earth is full of air
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Old story, New names
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: YBM
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• The GOD CIPHER
  • From: Jeff
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: shuba
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: polly
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: what other waves out there?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity as geometrical interpretation is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity as geometrical interpretation is wrong
  • From: Igor
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: Igor
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: who is the moon belonging to?
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Supernovae Redshift vs. Brightness
  • From: nitelite
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: valls
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: valls
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Eric Gisse 100% ignorant about RELATIVIY.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photons
  • From: valls
• antigravity by electrons into a circular superconductor
  • From: dendron
• Re: Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: ZikZak
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: dendron
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: dendron
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: valls
• why you should not trust a doctor
  • From: dendron
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• landing on Mars using GPS
  • From: dendron
• Re: Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: flamestar
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• relativity as geometrical interpretation is wrong
  • From: dendron
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photons
  • From: joilly17
• Re: Photons
  • From: Pmb
• Photons
  • From: joilly17
• Re: Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: flamestar
• Re: Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: flamestar
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity Question On Frame of Reference 2:
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Relativity Question On Frame of Reference 2:
  • From: flamestar
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bill
• Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.
  • From: flamestar
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: John Park
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: who is the moon belonging to?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: vern
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: why is the universe mostly empty?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: vern
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: who is the moon belonging to?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• "Gravity"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: why is the universe mostly empty?
  • From: buff
• Re: who is the moon belonging to?
  • From: buff
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: vern
• Re: who is the moon belonging to?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why is the universe mostly empty?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: why is the universe mostly empty?
  • From: PD
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: buff
• tapping energy from not existing sun
  • From: buff
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The slinky Universe
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: why is the universe mostly empty?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dono
• rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why is the universe mostly empty?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why is the universe mostly empty?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: John M. Dlugosz
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: PD
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: PD
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: PD
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: PD
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: PD
• Re: why is the universe mostly empty?
  • From: HeLives
• Re: A strange (mental) experiment about relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: Dono
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: vern
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Paul Andersen's article showed Eric Gisse is IGNORANT on Temperature and Lorentz scalars.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: PD
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: PD
• Re: light paradox
  • From: PD
• The slinky Universe
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: A strange (mental) experiment about relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A strange (mental) experiment about relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A strange (mental) experiment about relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: PD
• Re: A strange (mental) experiment about relativity
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: red wine and relativity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: Rigged Hilbert Spaces
  • From: pmb
• Re: A strange (mental) experiment about relativity
  • From: Fabrizio Bartolomucci
• Re: red wine and relativity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: my infrared methane sensor is decreasing ,can you help me?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?
  • From: vern
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: PD
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• my infrared methane sensor is decreasing ,can you help me?
  • From: 秦少平
• Re: quantum mechanics makes perfect sense
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Please people be carefull what you write in the net about God and about God's knowledge !!!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Please people be carefull what you write in the net about God and about God's knowledge !!!
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: bz
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: Rigged Hilbert Spaces
  • From: pmb
• Re: light paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: red wine and relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?
  • From: gregory . lee . bartholomew
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: fleesow
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Martin Winer
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Martin Winer
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Martin Winer
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Martin Winer
• E = mc^2 ?= information * ?
  • From: Martin Winer
• Re: light paradox
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: faster than own light
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: conquistador
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: conquistador
• light paradox
  • From: conquistador
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• faster than own light
  • From: conquistador
• Re: Secrets of Gravity and Unified field theory
  • From: Sue...
• Re: red wine and relativity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: About exp(X) and invariance (KST).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Paul Andersen's article showed Eric Gisse is IGNORANT on Temperature and Lorentz scalars.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: conquistador
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: conquistador
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: conquistador
• Re: About exp(X) and invariance (KST).
  • From: conquistador
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: PD
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: PD
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: conquistador
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: conquistador
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: PD
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: variable
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• red wine and relativity
  • From: variable
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: variable
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• About exp(X) and invariance (KST).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Please people be carefull what you write in the net about God and about God's knowledge !!!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A strange (mental) experiment about relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: shuba
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: dlzc
• A strange (mental) experiment about relativity
  • From: Fabrizio Bartolomucci
• Paul Andersen's article showed Eric Gisse is IGNORANT on Temperature and Lorentz scalars.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Secrets of Gravity and Unified field theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: bz
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: harry
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Light on its path...
  • From: Sue...
• Light on its path...
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Supernovae Redshift vs. Brightness
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: funk420
• Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: PD
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: PD
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: Sue...
• Errors being made by SR experts.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: variable
• Re: time reversal
  • From: variable
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: variable
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: variable
• Re: quantum mechanics makes perfect sense
  • From: variable
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: variable
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: variable
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Secrets of Gravity and Unified field theory
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Secrets of Gravity and Unified field theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eureka! Unified Quantum Field Theory FINALLY RESOLVED!!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: quantum mechanics makes perfect sense
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eureka! Unified Quantum Field Theory FINALLY RESOLVED!!!
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: time reversal
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: PD
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Sue...
• A new approach to General and Special Relativity
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: shuba
• Re: Supernovae Redshift vs. Brightness
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Supernovae Redshift vs. Brightness
  • From: nitelite
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The religious worship of SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: bz
• Re: The end of SR!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: xxein
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: variable
• Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?
  • From: variable
• Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST)
  • From: variable
• Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: life time of an atom
  • From: variable
• Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?
  • From: variable