Re: Errors being made by SR experts.

Jeckyl <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Errors being made by SR experts.
. . . .

O'Barr wrote:
...Let us take an inertial line in space upon
. . . .

O'Barr wrote:
PD, where have you been? Has it been a while
since we have heard from you?
. . .

O'Barr wrote:
It cannot spin in two different directions all
at the same time.

Jeckyl <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It isn't (if we're talking inertial frames)

O'Barr comments:
I will accept your answer.

O'Barr wrote:
It cannot even spin at two
different rates at the same time.

Jeckyl <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It isn't (if we're talking inertial frames)

O'Barr comments:
I will accept your answer.

O'Barr wrote:
It cannot be both hot and cold

Jeckyl <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes it can .. depending on who is looking
at it. An eskimo might think it
hot and a african tribesman might think it cold

O'Barr comments:
I will accept your answer.

O'Barr wrote:
or strong or weak,

Jeckyl <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes it can .. a little baby might
think it strong, mr universe might think
it weak

O'Barr comments:
I will accept your answer.

O'Barr wrote:
or hard or soft,

Jeckyl <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes it can .. a little baby might
think it hard, mr universe might think it soft

O'Barr wrote:
or blue or yellow.

Jeckyl <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ever hear of the doppler effect?

O'Barr comments:
I will accept your answer.

O'Barr wrote:
And no particle can be going at one velocity, and
then instantly change its velocity as it moves into
another frame.

Jeckyl <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It doesn't change velcoity and it doesn't
move into another frame.
It simulatneously has the velocities
it has in all the frame it is in .. you
can't go in and out of frames .. a frame
is the entire universe

O'Barr comments:
I will accept your answer. I am not saying
that any of your answers up above are good
answers, but I can understand the reasoning
you are using whether or not I agree with it.

So now, Jeckyl, now give us an explanation
as to how one photon can be going at a velocity
of c in these 10 frames that are all moving at
different velocities all at the exact same time.
As you yourself said, each frame extends to
all of infinity, and this one photon is in
all these frames all at the same time. So
how is it moving at c in all these frames.
Is Mr. Atlas going to save you? Is the
eskimo going to save you? Just tell me
again how one photon is moving at c in all
10 frames. Show us how this is done.
Don't just use words. describe it so that
we will all understand. Describe it so
that everyone in all 10 frames will
understand it.
Thanks!

[snip]

[snip]

Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Note to all the world.
    ... Jeckyl wrote: ... Harry wrote: ... where even their absolute speeds might end up being ... velocity in all inertial frames of reference, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR is a true science.
    ... Jeckyl wrote: ... and see what the true facts were ... past reference frames is not c. ... None of these measurements are irrelevant, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OBarr: Modifications of SR have begun.
    ... Jeckyl wrote: ... velocity of light is a constant, c, in all ... light is c in all frames is in error. ... will show, by SR measurements, that the relative ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: It is not always c!
    ... Jeckyl wrote: ... will use frame A and frame B as two valid SR ... measurements or calculations, ... To calculate closing or separation velocity, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
    ... O'Barr's comments to Jeckyl (and all others who might ... of light is a straight line velocity of c), ... which has one frame as being ... the symmetry of velocity between frames ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast