Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:24:40 GMT
<rotchm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1186422700.698496.44640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The width of the gap in the wall shriks only in an apparent way
(actually it "rotates", check Terrell-Penrose), in the evil twin
frame.
Dont confuse him;
Everything anyone ever communicated in any way to him,
has confused Seppala in every possible anyone con possibly
imagine.
I propose we try to confuse him *even more*. He loves that.
Dirk Vdm
His problem has nothing to do with the Terrell-.
Penrose effect.
True that there may be such effects, but they are 'apparent', often
called 'photographable' effects and have nothing to do with the
kinematics/dynamics of the problem.
If you disagree with me, ask Tom.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: David
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- References:
- Evil Twin Paradox
- From: David
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Evil Twin Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
