Re: Evil Twin Paradox

On Aug 6, 2:44 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Dono" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1186436582.008620.78500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 6, 2:40 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Dono" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1186436192.474944.310740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 6, 2:29 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Dono" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1186435671.285051.31940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 6, 11:41 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Dono" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1186425017.629814.74950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 6, 11:24 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
<rot...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1186422700.698496.44640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The width of the gap in the wall shriks only in an apparent way
(actually it "rotates", check Terrell-Penrose), in the evil twin
frame.

Dont confuse him;

Everything anyone ever communicated in any way to him,
has confused Seppala in every possible anyone con possibly
imagine.
I propose we try to confuse him *even more*. He loves that.

Dirk Vdm

His problem has nothing to do with the Terrell-
Penrose effect.

True that there may be such effects, but they are 'apparent', often
called 'photographable' effects and have nothing to do with the
kinematics/dynamics of the problem.

If you disagree with me, ask Tom.

Just did, I gave the problem right back to him, in simplified form.

Never do that.
Just like he always does, give it back to him in Distorted Complexified
Twisted form.

Dirk Vdm- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I decided to try something different :-)

That way you'll end up confusing him ;-))

Dirk Vdm- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Interesting, I never thought about that :-)
I was thinking more about forcing him to use real SR instead of what
Paul Cardinale called a "cartoon" version of SR (I will remember that)

But he *does* use the real version of Sepalla Relativity!

Dirk Vdm

You mean the length contraction formula? Yes, I've seen that :-)

Oops, made a typo in previous message.
As from now, for ease of reference, let's officially call it
Seppalaial Relativity.

Dirk Vdm



;-) :-)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evil Twin Paradox
    ... , in the evil twin ... frame. ... has confused Seppala in every possible anyone con possibly ... Penrose effect. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evil Twin Paradox
    ... frame. ... has confused Seppala in every possible anyone con possibly ... Penrose effect. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evil Twin Paradox
    ... has confused Seppala in every possible anyone con possibly ... imagine. ... Penrose effect. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evil Twin Paradox
    ... , in the evil twin ... frame. ... Dont confuse him; His problem has nothing to do with the Terrell- ... Penrose effect. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evil Twin Paradox
    ... , in the evil twin ... frame. ... Dont confuse him; His problem has nothing to do with the Terrell- ... Penrose effect. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast