Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:41:29 -0700
On Aug 6, 11:40 pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <d...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dear paparios:
<papar...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1186450477.952396.175050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a couple of questions about the values you have
in your webpage.
1) If I'm accelerating at 1 g for 2 years, that means my
speed is increasing, approx. by 10 m/sec every second.
In your frame.
The acceleration is the same in everyone's frame.
Whether the ship nudges the tail end of another
ship causing a space fender-bender or whether
the ship slams head-on with a wrong way Jedi
knight, the energy released will shown by
K.E = 1/2 mv^2
otherwise PoR is violated.
<<The special principle of relativity states that
physical laws should be the same in all inertial
reference frames, but that they may vary across
non-inertial ones. >>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_relativity
This causes SR to be invalid where mass and
structure has to be considered.
<< the special relativity
principle formulated originally for physics in empty
space is not valid in the matter-filled universe. >>
C. S. Unnikrishnan
http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/dec252005/2009.pdf
Sue..
Since the year has 365 days and each day has 86400
seconds. So at the end of 2 years my final speed would
be 630,720,000 m/sec, that is, 630,720 km/sec, which is
2.1c. How could it be?
It isn't.
http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/Relativity/SR/rocket...
David A. Smith
.
- References:
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Twin paradox revisited ll
- Prev by Date: Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- Next by Date: Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox revisited ll
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
