Re: a relative question
- From: "Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:34:46 -0700
Subject: a relative question
<curiousee...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A physicist on Wikipedia suggested I post here.
He also said I would get flamed, but such is life.
<deletes by O'Barr>
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> comments:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Remove ... for e-mail.
comments about mass.
Some of the things being said here about mass make
some interesting points for me. Let me explain one
or two things about mass as I have seen it work in
the at theory.
First of all, there is mass in the ether field.
In fact, that is all that the ether consists of, of
particles of mass, having no other characteristics
other than their mass, and the motions of their mass.
So there is kinetic energy and momentum, due both to
linear motions and to spins.
Now these ether particles of mass are constantly
colliding with other large particles in the ether.
But all collisions on this level result in spalls!
Ether particles do at times also collide with
each other, but
they are so small that they do not collide very often
with each other, and when they do collide, the
majority of times result in an equal net exchange of
mass, and the collision ends up being meaningless.
(The only time forces are created is when the
exchange of mass that occurs in a spall produces two
new sizes of particles. In any one collision, if one
particle increases in size, then of course the other
must decrease in size.)
Now these ether particles, in hitting and spalling
with all other particles that exist within the ether
field, could in fact add mass to every particle being
hit. These ether particles could also remove mass
from any and all particles that are present within
the field. A particle could actually disappear
(become part of the ether field.) But that is not
normal. Changes in mass are normal only within a
very small range: there is a QM exchange of mass
going on continuously. And in fact, it is this
constant exchange of mass that allows there to be all
the forces that exist in the ether.
Basic force fields in the ether are created when
some large particle, A, acts as follows: Let particle
A, in its spalls with the ether, cause all ether
spalls to be of medium size only. Thus, a large
ether particle will spall a medium size ether
particle that causes particle A to become temporarily
larger. But when a small ether particle spalls with
particle A, it also spalls a medium size ether
particle, and particle A then returns back to its
more normal size. So around a type A particle, the
ether field becomes more narrow in its distribution,
now being found with more medium size particles.
Now another large particle B does the following:
It only allows a mix of large or small ether
particles. When a medium size ether particle hits
particle B, particle B spalls at one time (50% of the
time) a large size ether particle, and at other times
(the other 50% of the time) a medium size ether
particle results in a spall of a smaller size ether
particles. So around particle A, the distribution of
sizes of ether particles are reduced, and around
particle B, the distribution of sizes of ether
particles are increased. But the total mass remains
the same. And neither particle A or particle B
change their total mass over any large time period.
All the major field effects in the ether are thus
due to these changes in the mix of sizes in the ether
field, not due to any total change in the mass or
even the energy. And these changes in the mix can be
almost endless, both in terms of their amounts (total
number of particles involved) or degree (range of
changes in sizes), as well as to the nature of these
changes (deviations around the mid ranges or changes
in deviations at the extremities, etc.) And other
particles can react only on one set of differences or
to another set, etc.) These choices are endless.
And both charge like reactions and gravity like
reactions can all be accommodated within such
variables.
And obtaining equal and opposite responses is, in
many of these relationships, automatic. It just
happens since the creation of one mix automatically
creates an opposite mix. To explain this a little
requires this kind of thinking: The average mix in
the ether will be due to the combined effects of all
particles. If you have one set of particles that
cause a reduction of size distribution, and another
causing an increase, then if the number of these two
particles are equal in terms of the interactions that
are occurring, then the average of the ether
distribution will be the sum of both sets of
particles. The deviation being caused by one becomes
the exact equal or balance to what is being caused by
the other, and this cannot be prevented.
If one type of particle were to change, then over
time, the average would also change. And in the end,
a balance would return to the total mix as
equilibrium is eventually achieved over time.
So here we see that the normal forces of nature
are not really based upon the continuous addition or
loss of mass or energy or number of particles (such
as the shading done by LeSage), but the changes in
the mix of ether particle sizes and the reactions to
these changes in mix of sizes, all based upon the
continuous exchange of mass back and forth between
different particles using the ether as a medium and
the spall process.
Please note that these changes in mix really can
be assumed to be imaginary particles, and with these
particles representing the size of the changes in the
mix, we gain the full QM approach of using exchange
particles to include particle, anti-particle duality,
a reasonably fixed field velocity, and a momentum and
energy exchange that appears to be non-Newtonian. It
really is Newtonian, but we are just not used to the
results that can be obtained from spall mechanics.
So now the point that I want to make: If any
particle did actually grow in mass, have mass
actually added to it, that would be a high order
disruption of everything, and it would immediately
affect all things around it. It just does not occur,
unless you have an atomic bomb like reaction.
So yes, I would be happy to find that these gains
in mass are some other act that produces the same
final effect, but is not an actual gain in real mass.
But again, real gains in mass really is possible with
the ether, it is just that I do not know how to allow
this without a lot of other things that appear likely
to happen.
Thanks for reading.
Gerald.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a relative question
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: a relative question
- References:
- a relative question
- From: curiouseeker
- a relative question
- Prev by Date: Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: a relative question
- Next by thread: Re: a relative question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
