Re: Photons
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:01:05 -0000
On Aug 9, 3:52 am, John Kennaugh
<J...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is sloppy thinking. In classical electrodynamics circa Maxwell a
'field' was a physical stress in the aether. Action-at-a-distance force
between charges was transferred via this stress and the stress could
propagate through the aether at c in the form of light. Despite the fact
that relativity owes its existence to Einstein's belief in some sort of
aether, the concept of the aether has become highly unfashionable
resulting in the almost universal acceptance of the 'no aether
doctrine'. The fallout of this is that while physicists still talk in
terms of 'fields' the word no longer has a meaning.
It is true that the term "field" means something different than it
originally did. That does not mean that it is now without meaning.
PD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Photons
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons
- References:
- Photons
- From: joilly17
- Re: Photons
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Photons
- From: John Kennaugh
- Photons
- Prev by Date: Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
- Next by Date: Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Photons
- Next by thread: Re: Photons
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|