Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: dlzc <dlzc1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:09:05 -0700
Dear David:
On Aug 9, 4:56 am, David <dsepp...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 20:13:51 -0700, "N:dlzcD:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"....
In this frame the evil twin is firing
a 100 millimeter projectile along the
y axis.
*Who's* y-axis? You want the bullet to
appear to travel straight from the moving
twin... for whom?
As I stated in the original posting, the
evil twin's weapon ... is always pointed
perpendicular to the x-axis as measured in
his moving reference frame.
So the gap is much larger than 100 mm *to the bullet*, and so is
possible to strike the stationary twin (depending on y-component of
velocity). Only your expectation that light from both edges of a 10
ly wide gap defines what the bullet can pass through is in error. It
is still the "simultaneity" thing, David.
David A. Smith
.
- References:
- Evil Twin Paradox
- From: David
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: David
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: David
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: David
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- From: David
- Evil Twin Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
- Next by Date: Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts)
- Previous by thread: Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Evil Twin Paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|