Re: Anomalous gravity in rotating superconductors

On Aug 10, 6:45 pm, mike3 <mike4...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 10, 6:28 pm, Jack Sarfatti <sarfa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Also I only took the linear term in the Einstein-Hilbert tetrad action
expansion.

Actually there are action denominator G terms ~ G(Newton)N^p/3 where p -
0, 1, 2, 3, 4

in Lambda(zpf)e^a/\e^b/\e^c/\e^d

e^a = I^a + (1/N)^1/3A^a

For Salam f-gravity

N = 1/Lp^2/\zpf(f) ~ 10^66/(1/10^-13)^2 ~ 10^6610^-26 ~ 10^40

N^1/3 ~ 10^13

N^4/3 ~ 10^62

However there are other factors in the modified de Mateos-Beck equations
not just powers of N.

More on this tomorrow. The induced gravimagnetic field is for Salam
f-gravity

Bg ~ (angular rotation rate)(Gm/c^2)N^4/3(condensate density)(/\zpf)^-1

~ (angular rotation rate)10^-5210^62 10^-26(condensate density)

~ (angular rotation rate)10^-16(superconductor condensate density)

This is one thing I've always wondered about. Has anyone
done any _serious_ experiments to actually test this claim
about superconductors generating gravitational fields?
[...]

1) Jack Sarfatti produces nothing but spew. Looking for insight in one
of his posts is like looking for a diamond in a pile of cow ***.
2) www.google.com "Podkletnov"

Podkletnov's experiments were re-ran many times to zero effect.
Superconductors do /not/ generate gravitational fields, despite lots
of people hoping otherwise.

.

Quantcast