O'Barr comments to the net.
- From: "Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:06:53 -0700
O'Barr comments to the net.
Your attention is directed to the following
series of posts:
Errors being made by SR experts.
and: Types of SR measurements.
These posts have ended with the following facts
being accepted: SR math does not require us to
say that the speed of light is really c in every
inertial frame. In fact, the only thing that any
SR expert should say is that we do not really know
what the actual relative speed of light is in any
frame. All that can be said is that the velocity
of light will be measured to be c within any one
frame. But it is not likely that it really is c.
All external or independent SR observers
will not (cannot) confirm that it really is c.
Because of what has happened in the above two
series of posts, I say the following:
Some good things are about to begin on this net.
We are going to see, for the first time, a change in
our basic science. It will really be simple: The
math we use will basically remain the same. But we
are going to see a change in the interpretations of
the math. We are going to see, and accept as a fact,
that an absolute reference frame is possible. In
fact, not only is it possible, but very likely.
Now it might be interesting to see how this
happens. The net has never before been used to
accomplish such a big event. And many might feel
that they must be in control, or that they have a
need to prove that they said certain things first,
etc. Such things do not matter to me. To me, anyone
can take credit for anything. All I want to see is
progress. So let us see how all this might begin,
and how it all ends. Who is really going to be the
first to say it? Best to everyone who cares to help!
Sincerely,
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>
******************* Remove ... for e-mail.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
- Prev by Date: Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
- Next by Date: Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
- Previous by thread: Re: Schwarzschild radius was derived by John Michell in 1783
- Next by thread: Re: O'Barr comments to the net.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
