Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE

On 17 ago, 15:48, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 17, 11:37 am, va...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[snip idiocy]

1) There is no potential energy in SR.
This is an out of topic statement, I am referring to 1905 Relativity.
But yes, at least there isn't gravitational potential energy in SR,
because as part of GR, SR applies only in a local region where
gravitational potential is considered constant (space-time "flat").
2) There is no principle of equivalence in SR.
Total agreement (even if not relevant to 1905R), that principle is an
essential part of GR.
3) Brillouin does not understand relativity.
I know it was one of the best cybernetists of XX Century, working in
the relationship between information and energy (I remeber also about
"Brillouin equipotential surfaces" inside crystals). Anyway, he didn't
seem putting much attention on 1905 Relativity original papers (he
makes no specific references to them, you make someone?). In his
papers he only recognizes that the field has related with its energy a
mass, not realizing that this mass is the own particle rest one.In
Quantum Theory this is very clear with the virtual bosons modelling
particle interactions. Revise particle-antiparticle and photons mutual
transformation (a direct experimental evidence about rest mass
measuring potential energy, total system energy measured by particles
mass when infinite separated at rest being equal to the total kinetic
energy of the photons). Revise also "binding energy". Do you really
think that the positive energy going out remains as negative inside
(and with negative mass!) making very important physical functions?

I can't belive that you don't detected any thing wrong in my
derivation! Surely you are waiting for a more profound reading of it.
But it has very low level mathematics, isn't it? No higher rank
tensors, space separated from time, only Euclidean space and Cartesian
coordinates used, Newton practically considered a relativistic guy,
and with all this trivial stuff explaining gravitational effects? What
a lack of respect for GR!

RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Potential energy in Einsteins 1905 Relativity
    ... relationship from the Principle of Relativity (PoR, ... Jun 30 paper) and the Principle of Energy (PoE, ... measuring rest mass its potential energy. ... inaplicability of potential energy in relativity is that you don't ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
    ... Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity ... he considers the mass corresponding to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • 1905 Relativity is sufficient to support GPS function
    ... "Relativity in the Global Positioning System" with the following ... field and total energy is conserved. ... center of mass Me. ... The gravitational potential energy U was before Einstein U=-GM/r, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Einsteins Sep27 1905 paper
    ... consider the energy associated with the rest mass as a potential energy ... Not relation is established at all between the rest mass ... notwithstanding the bogus additions to special relativity ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: 1905 Relativity is sufficient to support GPS function
    ... >>> I have to think in that way is that the relativistic mass concept was ... energy of classical gravity is not zero at large distances. ... > of kinetic and potential energy is taking place. ... >> absence of an additive constant. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast