Re: Light quanta.
- From: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:41:06 GMT
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187388014.118175.28980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: On Aug 17, 11:35 am, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: > "Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: >
: > news:1187359937.946016.206960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > : On Aug 17, 10:06 am, socratus <israel...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: > : > Another comment .
: > : > ===========
: > : > Let me try:
: > : > We know that
: > : > E=hv
: > : > v=E/h
: > :
: > : This relates the energy of a photon to the frequency
: > : of the associated EM radiation.
: > :
: > : > Now, h is a constant so it is directly proportional to energy E.
: > : > Let me further classify this equation.
: > : > We also know that E=0.5kT
: > :
: > : This relates the average kinetic energy of a
: > : molecule to temperature in Kelvin.
: > :
: > : > Putting it into the above equation v=(0.5kT)/h
: > :
: > : What are you modeling that involves equating the
: > : average KE of a molecule in a gas with the energy of
: > : a photon?
: > :
: > No, you idiot, he's just proven colour is proportional to
: > temperature, as you've been told before.
:
: You're talking about Wein's Displacement Law,
No I'm not, I'm talking about you being an idiot with no knowledge
of basic physics, relying as you do on government DOT publications.
Buses stop as quickly and in as short a distance as cars, colour is
temperature, "we establish by definition that the ``time'' required by
light to travel from A to B equals the ``time'' it requires to travel from
B to A" is pure, unadulterated nonsense and you are a lying troll
who said "I'm trolling you if you like".
As Uncle Stooopid asserts, "ignorance is educable, stupidity is forever".
You are eternally stupid, a mere pest on those that think it through
as "socratus" has done. Leave the students alone, haemorrhoid; you,
Phuckwit Duck and Humpty Roberts are royal pains in the arse and
Uncle Stooopid isn't much better, even if he's amusing which you are not.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Light quanta.
- From: socratus
- Re: Light quanta.
- References:
- Light quanta.
- From: socratus
- Re: Light quanta.
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Light quanta.
- From: socratus
- Re: Light quanta.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Light quanta.
- From: Androcles
- Re: Light quanta.
- From: Randy Poe
- Light quanta.
- Prev by Date: Re: Debunking Nimtz
- Next by Date: Re: It is not always c!
- Previous by thread: Re: Light quanta.
- Next by thread: Re: Light quanta.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|