Re: Debunking Nimtz
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould <br276deleteme@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:26:43 +0100
Jerry wrote:
Nevertheless, I believe tht I have discerned a feature of
his setup that points beyond mere stupidity. Rather, this
feature points to actual -fraud-.
That's an interesting observation, but I'm strongly inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, in the sense of Hanlon's razor.
-- Ben
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debunking Nimtz
- From: Jerry
- Re: Debunking Nimtz
- References:
- Debunking Nimtz
- From: Dono
- Re: Debunking Nimtz
- From: Josef Matz
- Re: Debunking Nimtz
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Debunking Nimtz
- From: Jerry
- Debunking Nimtz
- Prev by Date: Re: How fast is light moving past reference frame X?
- Next by Date: Re: Light quanta.
- Previous by thread: Re: Debunking Nimtz
- Next by thread: Re: Debunking Nimtz
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|