Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory

On 22 ago, 17:22, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:34:27 -0700, va...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 21 ago, 12:30, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 21, 9:27 am, va...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]

Dude, Brioullin doesn't know /beans/ about relativity.

Why do you...yea ok you don't know any better. Just stop, ok?

Do you read already the 1905 Einstein's papers? I am waiting for you.
Let me see if you at least started doing it. At the beginning of
paragraph 1 of his 1905 Jun 30 paper, Einstein writes:

{Let us take a system of co-ordinates in which the equations of
Newtonian mechanics hold good.

TEXTBOOK DEFINITION OF INERTIAL.

Learn to read.

[..]
What a strange comment! You select the first two lines of my quote to
1905 Einstein's words and make what seems a criticism to them. Are you
telling Einstein that learn to read in a today textbook what he writes
is a definition of inertial? If this is the case, your behaviour is
totally absurd, today knowledge can't be used to interpret and old
text (you must use only the own epoch knowledge). But if your comment
is directed to me, then it is more absurd yet, because in my last post
I don't make any interpretation of the Einstein's word that you
select. As always, you ignore completely all my direct references to
1905 Einstein's papers proving that 1905 Relativity is NOT today
Special Relativity. If you are not interested at all in the 1905
epoch, why you remain answering me on this topic (without any relevant
comment)?

RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
    ... telling Einstein that learn to read in a today textbook what he writes ... You would be better off if you bothered to learn some physics. ... you ignore completely all my direct references to ... Einstein's special relativity and Minkowski's reformulation are / ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • The facts that really matter are as follows...
    ... It may be regarded as the Mother of the Universe. ... is the only one that is consistent with special relativity. ... Einstein: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: velocity of light.
    ... >Einstein is out of date. ... for example about possibility of time dilation. ... The derivation given ... >This article will, I hope, show why physicists believe in Special Relativity ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Einstein often spoke of " Universal Causation ".
    ... You'd have to actually _ read _ something Einstein wrote ... there is no real distinction between the space and time coordinates, ... " Is There an Alternative to the Block Universe View? ... is the only one that is consistent with special relativity. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... � � Since you say that the mathematics for special relativity are ... SPECIAL RELATIVITY CANNOT DESCRIBE THE ORBIT OF A SATELLITE. ... scientists limit their use of Special Relativity to specific ... Who cares what Einstein did? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast