Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: "Pmb" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:14:46 -0400
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187933674.505283.28480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 23, 10:21 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
No, what is required is an understanding of physics as defined in
1905. What Einstein writes is the /textbook/ definition of intertial
which has not changed in well over a century.
LOL "intertial", duh wat's a spellan bok.
[rest of eric's crap snipped]
:-) Ken
Ken
I'm surpised at you. I expect more from you because you're a good person at
heart. Let's recall the Physics Newsgroup "Posting guidelines" at -
http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/newsgroups.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
Your postings will be read by thousands of people so it is worth taking a
minute to read it back and check the spelling, grammar and punctuation
before posting, but please don't waste bandwidth by correcting or
criticising other peoples spelling or grammar unless their errors obscure
what was being said. Pointless spelling corrections almost always draw
responses that correct spelling errors in the correction!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please do me a great favor? Try not to correct people's spelling. You don't
know why they spelled something wrong. Perhaps they have a learning disorder
such as dyslexia. Do you realize huh much I myself was harassed for this
when I started posting online? To me it feels like everytime you insult
someone's spelling that you're insulting me too because I made these same
mistakes because I have dyslexia. Be above this my friend. You're far too
good for it.
This, of course, is only a request from one friend to another. But when you
post things like this you're actually hurting me as well. Plus you don't
want to follow in androcles footsteps do you? People with dyslexia have
above average IQ. androlces sees people spelling things wrong and attributes
it to stupidity. Which of course shows us how ignorant he is. Please don't
make the same mistakes he does. Okay buddy?
Your friend
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- References:
- Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: valls
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: valls
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: valls
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- Prev by Date: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- Next by Date: Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- Next by thread: Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|