Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: David <dseppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:48:54 -0500
This problem is the classic Barn Pole paradox with the barn replaced
by a long threaded nut and the pole replaced by a long threaded rod.
Let there be a threaded nut of length L and a threaded rod also of
length L as measured in a rest frame. Let each of these have N
threads. Now let the threaded rod and threaded nut move toward each
other with equal and opposite velocities as measured in this rest
frame. And let the threaded nut and the threaded rod each rotate such
that when they meet the rotation rate is such that threaded nut and
threaded rod fit perfectly and neither the rod nor the nut undergo any
acceleration.
How is this viewed using SR in the rest frame of the nut? In this
frame, per SR, the threaded rod spans a shorter distance than the
threaded nut. So that when the rod is completely encased by the
nut,as viewed in the inertial frame of the nut, the N threads of the
rod span less than the N threads of the nut. I don't see how this is
physically possible. Can someone explain this using SR concepts.
Thanks,
David Seppala
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: harry
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- Prev by Date: Re: What Does SR stand For?
- Next by Date: Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- Previous by thread: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
- Next by thread: Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading