Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: David <dseppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:52:25 -0500
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:13:42 -0700, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"
<dlzc1@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear David:acceleration. I should have been more precise in the phrasing so as
"David" <dseppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5p58d3d6aiubpjio3g828vkldtfp3j6ej7@xxxxxxxxxx
This problem is the classic Barn Pole paradox with
the barn replaced by a long threaded nut and the
pole replaced by a long threaded rod.
Let there be a threaded nut of length L and a
threaded rod also of length L as measured in a
rest frame. Let each of these have N threads.
Now let the threaded rod and threaded nut move
toward each other with equal and opposite
velocities as measured in this rest frame. And
let the threaded nut and the threaded rod each
rotate such that when they meet the rotation
rate is such that threaded nut and threaded rod
fit perfectly and neither the rod nor the nut
undergo any acceleration.
How do you have rotation without acceleration, David?
From the context, I thought everyone would have known I meant linear
not to confuse others.
Here, again, I mean the longitudinal length of the rod versus the
How is this viewed using SR in the rest frame
of the nut?
Note that for any appreciable axial velocity, the tangential
velocity will be many times greater... depending on the pitch.
In this frame, per SR, the threaded
rod spans a shorter distance than the threaded
nut.
No, because the surface of the threaded rod is moving at an angle
to the nut's central axis. You are ignoring the meshing surface,
while concentrating on the "center of mass".
longitudinal length of the nut.
Perhaps not, but I can count. If the nut has 100 threads that means
So that when the rod is completely
encased by the nut,as viewed in the inertial
frame of the nut, the N threads of the rod span
less than the N threads of the nut. I don't see
how this is physically possible. Can someone
explain this using SR concepts.
SR doesn't do acceleration simply enough that you can understand,
David. It seems to keep leaking out of your head.
as measured in the nut's frame 100 peaks and 100 valleys at each
instant of time are aligned on a line parallel to the longitudinal
length of the nut on the nut's interior surface. If the threaded rod
also has 100 threads that means that as measured in the nut's frame
the threaded rod also has 100 peaks and 100 valleys aligned along the
longitudinal length of the rod at any point in time. For the threaded
rod and screw to fit perfectly, each peak must be aligned with a
valley. But SR says that the 100 peaks and 100 valleys of the
threaded rod span a longitudinal distance greater than the 100 peaks
and 100 valleys of the threaded nut. This is contradictory - its a
simple counting exercise.
David
.
David A. Smith
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: dlzc
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- References:
- Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: David
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- Prev by Date: "The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
- Next by Date: Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe
- Previous by thread: Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- Next by thread: Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|