Re: Is it theory A or theory B?


However, only and only, that way along that matter, would break any business
arrangement, as also would break any compromising along that matter, all
along...

--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!


"Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1188486239.875807.191240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is it theory A or theory B?


Let us say that we have two theories:
Both theories say that x^2 is 49.

Theory A says that x = 7.
Theory B says that x = -7.
Thus both theories predict x^2 to equal 49.

Let us now say that the scientists have learned how
to measure x^2, but no test has yet been found to
measure x directly. All that can be measured is x^2.

Now what would anyone think about these
scientists, if they went and measured x^2, got 49,
and then they all said that they had just proved that
theory B was correct, and that theory A, of course,
had to be wrong since everyone knows that theory A
was a different theory than theory B?

Now there is nothing wrong with theory B. Theory
B does provide the correct answer for what can be
measured. And no one should find fault with theory B
at the present point of progress. But those who
support theory B the way it is described above are
not scientists. They are unacceptable. They do not
know how to think or to properly say things. They
must be rejected.

This simple problem of theory A or theory B is
exactly what I find in SR and LET. There might not
be anything wrong with either of these two theories
at the present time. But what is wrong is all these
SR experts who are unwilling to even appreciate the
problem. They just blindly accept SR with never
thinking that because of the nature of the math, no
measurement using this math can allow any person to
separate out the correct origin of the math.
This failure to even recognize the problem is
nothing but blind faith. It is unscientific. It is
going to have to end. And this process is now in
place.

It is of no value to have those who believe in x =
-7, to keep shouting that 49 is what has been
measured. One can say that 49 has been measured a
million times. You can say it until your face turns
blue. But that is not the problem. The problem is
not this knowing that you can measure 49! The
problem is that there are more than one way to get
49. And until we know the way that is actually used
to get 49, then we know nothing as for as the science
knows.

Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
    ... > Bill Hobba wrote: ... He specifically claimed matter ... Then banging a particle into another particle as per the photoelectric ... But not independent of measurement. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: aes decrypt encrypt
    ... Just now Dolf will shed the measurement, ... Feyd no matter how straightens it too, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Missing Matter
    ... If decoupling is at a particular density then I get 30^3 times the amount of matter at decoupling. ... When calculating redshift from a distant galaxy the reference frame for the initial state is determined only from the red-shifted light arriving from the galaxy, ... Typically in quantum theory experiments require a measurement of the initial state and a measurement for the final state, and are such that reference matter used for the initial measurement is rigidly related to that used for the final one; either the same coordinate axes and clock are used in both measurements or the coordinate axes and clocks are calibrated to each other. ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Is it theory A or theory B?
    ... Let us now say that the scientists have learned how ... support theory B the way it is described above are ... thinking that because of the nature of the math, ... measurement using this math can allow any person to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Best Foods - Hellmans Mayo
    ... AFAIAC it doesn't matter what you call something. ... cloth is sold by the yard. ... With metric measurement you don't have to do that. ... water temperature differences are more noticeable than air ...
    (rec.food.cooking)