Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
- From: "Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:41:55 -0700
varistor <w89q5o...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is it theory A or theory B?
Copy of the reply from PD that you received
and ignored earlier:
| > What is the science for SR and LET?
. . . . .
varistor <w89q5o...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
you still dident learned that it is forbidden ta make
copies of intellectual property and copyright materials
O'Barr comments:
I am the least on this net, and there are no copyrights
on what I produce on this net on the specific subject of
SR and LET. What is good enough for me is that there are
more than adequate public records being made that makes it
clear as to what was said and by whom on every point I
have made.
Anything that is bad is my load to carry.
But anything that is good is for everyone. It is
for everyone to use and to present and to accept as
their own.
Thanks for reading.
Gerald.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
- References:
- Is it theory A or theory B?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Is it theory A or theory B?
- Prev by Date: Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
- Next by Date: Re: why not video record all experiments?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
- Index(es):