Re: assumption or evidence?
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:02:31 -0700
On Aug 30, 2:10 pm, gigawatt <w89q5o...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 30, 2:08 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 28, 5:52 pm, gigawatt <w89q5o...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
assumption or evidence?
what EM, how does they know that what
inside an atom is EM?
and if it is EM how does thay explain that it is
10^43 stronger than gravity, ergo 10^56 stromger
force than light?
What makes you think gravity is 10^16 stronger than light?
where you got that 10^16 from?
That is the ratio 10^56/10^43. Or did you just make up numbers as you
typed?
if weaker forces are 10^43 magnitude ratio to gravity, then
light being EM as well, i dont even knoe what EM is
The "weak" forces are called that not because they are the weakest of
them all. They're just weaker than the nuclear force.
please explain EM consistency to my people, what is EM made of
Photons. Light.
if both weak forces, strong forces and light are
EM,
They're not.
what are they so?
Weak - W and Z bosons. Not light.
Strong - gluons. Not light.
how come that tha formers are huge compared
to tha latter
you mean that EM in an atom has higher amplitude
and higher frequency?
No.
No what, do a bit of explanation
It means that the coupling strength, the factor that relates how much
momentum transfer you get per unit charge, is stronger.
this is imposible
Of course it is. On the other hand, what you've described has nothing
to do with reality, so its impossibility is not a big concern.
what it is?
then please explain what reality is for me, in order for
me to go back ta my people to tell them what reality is
also for them
I suggest you start small. With a book. If I tell you, I don't have
much confidence it will get to your people in coherent form. Why don't
you have me tell your people for you? In fact, why don't you go back
to your seat with the rest of your people and listen along with them.
one hundred years of relativity and 40 years of moon landing,
and my people still dont know what gravity, EM, black holes,
big bang, matter, dark matter and magnetic field are.
That's easily fixed. Library cards are free.
thank you in advance for your e-mail
.
- References:
- Re: assumption or evidence?
- From: PD
- Re: assumption or evidence?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
- Next by Date: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
- Previous by thread: Re: assumption or evidence?
- Next by thread: How to pronounce the word "Sagnac"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
