Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
- From: bz <bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:54:32 +0000 (UTC)
"Josef Matz" <josefmatz@xxxxxxxx> wrote in news:46d7e3b6$0$4532$9b4e6d93
@newsspool3.arcor-online.net:
The background radiation on earth is isotropic and the deviation of the
fluctuations is less than 1 promille.
From this it can be concluded that our absolute velocity is less than 1000
km /s.
But the isotropic background is a ideal physical inertial system. Maybe the
only one !
It can't be very ideal if we appear to be "stationary" with respect to it
while we are moving at over 1000 km/s wrt the our galactic center and have
higher velocities wrt other galaxies.
What are the chances that THEY see their being 'stationary' wrt the
background radiation, also?
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
- References:
- Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
- From: Josef Matz
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
- From: funk420
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
- From: Josef Matz
- Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
- Prev by Date: Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
- Next by Date: Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
- Previous by thread: Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
- Next by thread: Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
- Index(es):