sci.physics.relativity
- Re: Atheism the worship of Complexity.,
JanPB
- UFT via gauge by KST.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: after 100 years of relativity,
JanPB
- Re: relativity predictions not available,
Paul Cardinale
- Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- A Change in the Science of Relativity.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Equivalence Principle Question,
funk420
- 3D,
marcofuics
- Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.,
Josef Matz
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR,
Puppet_Sock
- why not video record all experiments?,
contemplate7
- Is it theory A or theory B?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Is it theory A or theory B?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is it theory A or theory B?,
PD
"The Paradox of Zeno",
Olc
RELATIVITY CAUSES CANCER,
Don Stockbauer
How to pronounce the word "Sagnac",
Chengxian.Zhang
Re: assumption or evidence?,
PD
What is the science for SR and LET?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Truth and Potentiality,
markcraig
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Olc
Gravitational waves,
marcofuics
"The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations",
Olc
Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
David
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
David
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
dlzc
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
harry
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
dlzc
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
harry
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
dlzc
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
harry
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
dlzc
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
harry
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
Sue...
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
harry
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction,
Tom Roberts
Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
New Einstein Website,
info
Math Theories and Physical Theories.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
What Does SR stand For?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Androcles
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
JanPB
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Pmb
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Pmb
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
shuba
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Pmb
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Pmb
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Pmb
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Pmb
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
PD
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Pmb
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Randy Poe
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
PD
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Pmb
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
PD
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
JanPB
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Yuancur
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Yuancur
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Yuancur
Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Jeckyl
Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Paul Cardinale
Turn of the screw paradox/contradiction,
David
near the BH horizon,
marcofuics
Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
harry
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
harry
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
harry
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Dono
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Koobee Wublee
- Message not available
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
PD
- Re: Pound-Rebka revisited,
Sue...
Re: Understanding Einstein,
Don Stockbauer
Einstein & Lorentz made a BIG mistake.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sonoluminescence was Re: who are doin bubbles in that water?,
Randy Poe
Re: who are doin bubbles in that water?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Einstein & Lorentz seem completely incorrect.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Retic Postings and SPAM",
Tereh
Alternative solution to the Solar Neutrino Problem...,
ny2292000
Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
mluttgens
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Jeckyl
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
mluttgens
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
JanPB
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Androcles
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Jeckyl
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
JanPB
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Sue...
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Jeckyl
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Jeckyl
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Jeckyl
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Androcles
- Re: Astronomers Find a Hole in the Universe,
Jeckyl
Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.,
ny2292000
Groups and invariants in space time,
renzo
Something Odd in Greenland,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
Androcles
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
Androcles
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
David
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
Androcles
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
David
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
Androcles
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
David
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
Androcles
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
David
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
Androcles
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Something Odd in Greenland,
Androcles
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Tereh
Could human beings get to a planet 1000LY away...,
Peter Christensen
University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe,
alfredchenney
Relativity Principle Revisited,
Paul V.
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Shubee
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
funk420
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Peter Christensen
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Peter Christensen
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Dono
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Dono
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
RLG
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Androcles
- The Aether?,
Paul V.
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Paul V.
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Paul V.
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Paul V.
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Paul V.
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
funk420
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Relativity Principle Revisited,
Androcles
"A Snapshot of a Photon",
Tereh
excrement igor trolling usenet,
nell
a crane of light, is this possible?,
nell
need english translation...,
dwhig265
Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Yuancur
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Androcles
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Yuancur
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Yuancur
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
bz
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Scalar equaton F(ct, x, y, z) - G(ct, x, y, z) = 0: attn: Tom Roberts,
Pmb
SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
socratus
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Jeckyl
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Androcles
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Jeckyl
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
valls
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Jeckyl
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
valls
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
socratus
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Jeckyl
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
socratus
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Androcles
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Jeckyl
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Jeckyl
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Tom Roberts
- Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".,
Yuancur
Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?",
Josef Matz
ABOUT THE TIDES,
Stamenin
Tensors in Special Relativity,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Igor
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
nell
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
nell
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
WaiteDavid137
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Tensors in Special Relativity,
WaiteDavid137
"The Source of Gravitational Energy",
Tereh
Re: Deriving the LT from experimental laws ONLY,
Peter Christensen
Photon clocks,
joilly17
Re: Einstein's Errors,
Eric Gisse
THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS,
Stamenin
"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics",
Tereh
Re: magnetons are a more evolved form of gravitons?,
Jeckyl
Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Juan R.
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
valls
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
harry
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
harry
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
valls
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
valls
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
harry
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
valls
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
harry
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
valls
- Message not available
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Pmb
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
harry
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
bz
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
harry
Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
schoenfeld . one
Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Juan R.
Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Juan R.
Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory,
Juan R.
Re: MI5 Persecution: Silly-billy 6/7/96 (5715),
Don Stockbauer
PPN Question,
ajiko
Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space,
Jeckyl
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space,
dlzc
Re: gravity is vibrations in empty space,
Igor
Re: speed of light actually larger than 3 times larger than c,
Josef Matz
Before Einstein: 1900 Poincare wrote m = e/c^2 due to radiation,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Einstein Hoax",
Citer
Re: relativity cant explain tidals of water,
Don Stockbauer
Re: wavelength of light,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Message not available
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: wavelength of light,
PD
How fast is light moving past reference frame X?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
MInkowski Spacetime Diagrams,
WaiteDavid137
Relativity may be bound by an Absolute Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems",
Citer
Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds,
Dono
Re: New Maths for Superluminal Speeds,
Dono
- Message not available
- Message not available
Debunking Nimtz,
Dono
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Josef Matz
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Dono
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Traveler
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Dono
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Jerry
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
John Park
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Jerry
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Jerry
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Dono
- Re: Timo wrong,
Josef Matz
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Robert Clark
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Androcles
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Robert Clark
- Message not available
Re: What is the value of Einstein's so called "Cosmological Constant" ?,
Androcles
Re: Light speed broken,
Eric Gisse
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?",
Citer
Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Randy Poe
- Re: Light quanta.,
Androcles
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Androcles
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Androcles
- Re: Light quanta.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Light quanta.,
Randy Poe
- Re: Light quanta.,
Androcles
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Androcles
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Light quanta.,
socratus
- Re: Light quanta.,
PD
- Re: Light quanta.,
Androcles
- Re: Light quanta.,
PD
Macroscopic violation of special relativity,
Surfer
Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it,
PD
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: who did it, the universe, or what did it,
Jeckyl
Re: a top sciencist with a big yacht said that gravity is like powder sugar,
PD
THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Stamenin
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Bill Hobba
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
Dono
- Re: THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE,
valls
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets",
Citer
Re: The Problem Of Time In General Relativity (GR),
Bill Hobba
Toni sez "The local series rarely triggers Edna, it avoids Ismat instead.",
Ron
Julie sez "While gallerys politically dedicate guys, the rabbits often speed in addition to the extended carts.",
Karen
GR wrong ?,
Josef Matz
Jeremy sez "Many significant lentils are sharp and other fond sensitivitys are criminal, but will Yani pick that?",
Hassan AL-Shouli
Margaret sez "She'd lie alone than celebrate with Dilbert's crude harvest.",
Muhammad Tariq AL-Shouli
Ollie sez "He'll be comprising in spite of impossible Rifaat until his connection enforces locally.",
Norman
Anastasia sez "I am basically psychological, so I reach you.",
J. Y. Yorty-Pearson
Sue sez "Where doesn't Zakariya tip somewhere?",
Hala Karzai
Beth sez "Let's penetrate to the adequate ponds, but don't tip the average mums.",
Pilar
Al sez "It's very scared, I'll flash barely or Mike will sentence the integrations.",
Tom Y. Ripka
Jeff sez "Let's draft against the dreadful farms, but don't light the regional criterions.",
Gilbert
Ben sez "If the afraid amounts can amend literally, the spare uncle may sum more hills.",
Gilbert F. Sjoberg, MPSE
Samuel sez "Just now Richard will hire the phone, and if Abdel politically admires it too, the alpha will listen without the chinese memorial.",
Sam W. Phillians, C.O.O.
Francoise sez "To be enormous or quiet will embrace depressed photographers to deeply warm.",
Ibrahim Ramzi Azmath
Dolf sez "Other secondary prominent staircases will care comparatively in the light of rows.",
darin
Anastasia sez "Tell Karim it's happy glancing out of a tissue.",
Eve
Albert sez "If you will laugh Allen's sphere in relation to authors, it will faithfully detect the fellow.",
terrance
Sheri sez "Try proceeding the lodge's voluntary desk and Ibrahim will comply you!",
Peter
Re: light memory,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: light memory,
PD
Re: relativistic credibility,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: magnetic field lines,
Yuancur
Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Jeckyl
Simplified Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?,
David
Re: Fraud and Censorship in Science by criminal Relativists,
Jeckyl
Re: Is the metric still symmetric in Einstein-Cartan theory?,
Ken S. Tucker
It is not always c!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: It is not always c!,
Jeckyl
- Re: It is not always c!,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: It is not always c!,
PD
- Re: It is not always c!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: It is not always c!,
PD
- Re: It is not always c!,
Androcles
- Re: It is not always c!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: It is not always c!,
Androcles
- Re: It is not always c!,
Jeckyl
- Re: It is not always c!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: It is not always c!,
Androcles
- Re: It is not always c!,
Jeckyl
- Re: It is not always c!,
PD
- Re: It is not always c!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: It is not always c!,
PD
Explaining origin of Universe - researchers at Florida State University suggest answers,
harrishchandra . rbi
Re: newton was number two and plagiarized,
YBM
Hawking's example of time slowing down,
NFord
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Sue...
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Traveler
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
NFord
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Jeckyl
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Traveler
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Jeckyl
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Traveler
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Jeckyl
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Traveler
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Jeckyl
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Traveler
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Jeckyl
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Traveler
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Jeckyl
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
Traveler
- Re: Hawking's example of time slowing down,
qbit
Re: extracting free energy from white noise cosmic background radiation,
PD
"The Nature of Mass",
Citer
Time axis real, Space axes imaginary?,
Jean Paul
Length Contraction Paradox/Contradiction?,
David
Re: Almost no costly extra leafs deliberately pass as the united shells sack.,
Jerry
One thing you can do about the flood...,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
A COMPARITION OF ACHIEVENENTS BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN,
Stamenin
spam,
xxein
Re: god was wrong,
Jeckyl
Curved spacetime -- Einstein's mathematical error?,
perryv
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?",
Citer
Expanding universe,
Lem Ibbotson
Space's "accelerated" expansion rate could be affected by a change in it's curvature,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
sci.physics.relativity has descended into madness,
Daryl McCullough
Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe",
Jeckyl
Re: what other good theories?,
Jeckyl
Re: self-established relativists: an universe with only 3 spatial dimensions is impossible,
xxein
Re: General Theory of Theories,
Androcles
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether",
Citer
Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Where does the information come from?,
socratus
Re: Pokerization of Lottery,
bz
Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
- Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Pmb
Message not available
Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
BernardZ
Re: e=mc^2 still a postulate,
Dono
Re: GPS article,
Androcles
"Corrections to Special Relativity",
Citer
O'Barr comments to the net.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Jeckyl
- Re: O'Barr comments to the net.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Schwarzschild radius was derived by John Michell in 1783,
shuba
Re: Differences RT vs Newton,
Eric Gisse
Anomalous gravity in rotating superconductors,
Jack Sarfatti
rotating superconductors,
Jack Sarfatti
"Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?",
Citer
Re: Myth of GPS Employing the Nonsense of SR and GR,
Randy Poe
Give me feedback!,
ingennux
Re: all light is present not past,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Enthropy does not change due to SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Enthropy does not change in SuperTwin's Relativistic Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Proposed Relativity Experiment by G.Jaroszkiewicz, U of Nottingham UK,
Puppet_Sock
About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Randy Poe
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Randy Poe
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Yuancur
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Randy Poe
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Randy Poe
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Tom Roberts
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Tom Roberts
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
bz
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
bz
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Igor
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Shubee
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Eric Gisse
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Shubee
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Eric Gisse
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Eric Gisse
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Shubee
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Randy Poe
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Randy Poe
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Stamenin
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Jeckyl
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Stamenin
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Pmb
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
bz
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
bz
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Eric Gisse
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
bz
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
bz
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Eric Gisse
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
THE_ONE
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Jeckyl
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
THE_ONE
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Jeckyl
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
bz
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Eric Gisse
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Yuancur
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Tom Roberts
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Yuancur
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Yuancur
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
valls
- Re: About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones,
Tom Roberts
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics",
Citer
Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
shuba
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
shuba
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
mluttgens
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
shuba
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
mluttgens
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
mluttgens
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
shuba
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
mluttgens
- Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable from General Relativity,
Eric Gisse
The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts),
Pmb
Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts),
Ben Rudiak-Gould
Re: The Inertia of Stress (Attn: Tom Roberts),
Tom Roberts
speed of light,
joilly17
Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?),
David
sci.physics.relativity scheduled for sporge flood,
supernews
time travel in the news..,
funk420
Types of SR measurements.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
a relative question,
curiouseeker
- Re: a relative question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: a relative question,
harry
- Re: a relative question,
Randy Poe
- Re: a relative question,
PD
- Re: a relative question,
curiouseeker
- Re: a relative question,
PD
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
PD
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
PD
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
PD
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
curiouseeker
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
PD
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
PD
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
Randy Poe
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
Randy Poe
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
Randy Poe
- Re: a relative question,
Eric Gisse
- Re: a relative question,
Androcles
- Re: a relative question,
Gerald L. O'Barr
The dual split experiment,
Gert Baars
Drats - beat to it again,
Bill Hobba
pay attention. tha friends of dick van de mortel posting in alt.morons,
gonzales
Re: GPS frequency shift calculation,
Eric Gisse
Re: what is the mass of spacetime?,
BURT
Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?,
gregory . lee . bartholomew
Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?,
eugene_stefanovich
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Is the Red Shift of distant stars because of expanding universe or time dilation?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
if gravity were geometry,
early
space-time is not about mass, do i need to say more?,
piston
SR now stands for Stupid Results.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Special Piston Theory,
piston
Evil Twin Paradox,
David
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
harry
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
David
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Dono
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Alen
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
harry
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Alen
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
harry
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
shuba
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
harry
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Jeckyl
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
harry
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Alen
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
harry
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Alen
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Alen
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
Todd
- Re: Evil Twin Paradox,
harry
Re: Why is the speed of light also the max speed for everything else too?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass,
Pmb
Higgs and GR,
RichD
Re: earth is full of air,
Don Stockbauer
Old story, New names,
Garry Denke
The GOD CIPHER,
Jeff
Re: what other waves out there?,
Eric Gisse
Eric Gisse 100% ignorant about RELATIVIY.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
piston
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
John Park
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
PD
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
antigravity by electrons into a circular superconductor,
dendron
why you should not trust a doctor,
dendron
landing on Mars using GPS,
dendron
relativity as geometrical interpretation is wrong,
dendron
Photons,
joilly17
- Re: Photons,
Pmb
- Re: Photons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Photons,
piston
- Re: Photons,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons,
PD
- Re: Photons,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons,
PD
- Re: Photons,
Androcles
- Re: Photons,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons,
PD
- Re: Photons,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons,
PD
- Re: Photons,
John C . Polasek
- Re: Photons,
PD
- Re: Photons,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Photons,
John C . Polasek
- Re: Photons,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Photons,
John C . Polasek
- Re: Photons,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Photons,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons,
PD
- Re: Photons,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Photons,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Photons,
Androcles
- Re: Photons,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Photons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Photons,
Pmb
- Re: Photons,
John C . Polasek
- Re: Photons,
PD
- <Possible follow-ups>
- photons,
marcofuics
- Re: photons,
Jeckyl
- Re: photons,
Bill Hobba
- Re: photons,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: photons,
PD
- Re: photons,
marcofuics
- Re: photons,
PD
- Re: photons,
marcofuics
- Re: photons,
dlzc
- Re: photons,
marcofuics
- Re: photons,
dlzc
- Re: photons,
marcofuics
- Re: photons,
dlzc
- Re: photons,
marcofuics
- Re: photons,
PD
Relativity Question On Frame of Reference 2:,
flamestar
Relitivity Question On Frame of Reference.,
flamestar
"Gravity",
Tnec
Re: who is the moon belonging to?,
Jeckyl
tapping energy from not existing sun,
buff
rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Shubee
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Tom Roberts
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Tom Roberts
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Alen
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Alen
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
bz
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
shuba
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
YBM
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Jeckyl
- Re: rigid motion not possible in accelerating frame of reference,
Dono
Re: why is the universe mostly empty?,
HeLives
The slinky Universe,
jonas . thornvall
"Communicating at Translight Velocities",
Tnec
Re: Lorentz Ether Theory as a Preferred Frame?,
vern
my infrared methane sensor is decreasing ,can you help me?,
秦少平
Re: Rigged Hilbert Spaces,
pmb
Is the effect of gravity due to a bias in time?,
gregory . lee . bartholomew
E = mc^2 ?= information * ?,
Martin Winer
light paradox,
conquistador
faster than own light,
conquistador
Re: faster than own light,
marcofuics
Re: faster than own light,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
red wine and relativity,
variable
About exp(X) and invariance (KST).,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Please people be carefull what you write in the net about God and about God's knowledge !!!,
Pmb
A strange (mental) experiment about relativity,
Fabrizio Bartolomucci
Paul Andersen's article showed Eric Gisse is IGNORANT on Temperature and Lorentz scalars.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics",
Tnec
Light on its path...,
marcofuics
- Re: Light on its path...,
Sue...
- Re: Light on its path...,
PD
- Re: Light on its path...,
marcofuics
- Re: Light on its path...,
PD
- Re: Light on its path...,
marcofuics
- Re: Light on its path...,
PD
- Re: Light on its path...,
marcofuics
- Re: Light on its path...,
marcofuics
- Re: Light on its path...,
PD
- Re: Light on its path...,
marcofuics
- Re: Light on its path...,
PD
- Re: Light on its path...,
marcofuics
- Re: Light on its path...,
bz
- Re: Light on its path...,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Light on its path...,
marcofuics
Re: Problem with Fermi-Walker Transport in the Physics FAQ file,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Randy Poe
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
shuba
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
shuba
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
funk420
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Androcles
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Pmb
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
stephen
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
jonas . thornvall
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
harry
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
PD
- Re: Errors being made by SR experts.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
Sue...
- Re: Intensity and what else affects a single ligth beam's temperature?,
bz
hydrogen should solve if gravity is a residual of charge?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Secrets of Gravity and Unified field theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: quantum mechanics makes perfect sense,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Eureka! Unified Quantum Field Theory FINALLY RESOLVED!!!,
xray4abc
Re: time reversal,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
"General Relativity Examined",
Tnec
A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Sue...
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Sue...
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Sue...
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Sue...
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Sue...
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Sue...
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
marcofuics
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Sue...
- Re: A new approach to General and Special Relativity,
Igor
Supernovae Redshift vs. Brightness,
nitelite
Re: Space-Time, mathematics and physics,
Jean Paul
Re: Twin paradox and acceleration effects.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The religious worship of SR.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The end of SR!,
xxein
Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
variable
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
variable
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
PD
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
variable
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
PD
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
variable
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
PD
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
conquistador
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
PD
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
conquistador
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
Randy Poe
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
conquistador
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
Randy Poe
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
conquistador
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
Yuancur
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
bz
- Re: are electrons flying in circles, spirals or we dont know?,
PD
Re: Universe & Programmable Logic (KST),
variable
Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Jeckyl
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Jeckyl
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Jeckyl
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Jeckyl
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: Twin paradox revisited ll,
Mike Fontenot
Re: life time of an atom,
variable
Re: entropy only affects upwards from the molecular level?,
variable
