sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• Re: they want me to accept his tensors, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Yang-Mills substratum of Quantum Foam, Jack Sarfatti
• Quantum Foam, Jack Sarfatti
• Yang-Mills version of General Relativity's renormalizable substratum, Jack Sarfatti
  • Re: Yang-Mills version of General Relativity's renormalizable substratum, Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
    • Message not available
      • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
      • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Androcles
      • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
      • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
      • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Androcles
    • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Igor
• Three Time Puzzles, John Jones
  • Re: Three Time Puzzles, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Three Time Puzzles, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Three Time Puzzles, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: Three Time Puzzles, John Jones
      • Re: Three Time Puzzles, Simple Simon
    • Re: Three Time Puzzles, John Jones
      • Re: Three Time Puzzles, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Three Time Puzzles, Androcles
    • Re: Three Time Puzzles, John Jones
      • Re: Three Time Puzzles, Androcles
      • Re: Three Time Puzzles, John Jones
      • Re: Three Time Puzzles, Androcles
• "Causality", Olp
• Re: can universe make sense?, Don Stockbauer
• What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, valls
  • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Pmb
    • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, valls
      • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Pmb
      • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, valls
      • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Dono
  • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Louis_N
    • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, valls
• Re: the brain of einstein, xxein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: the brain of einstein, Igor
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, xxein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Igor
  • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, JanPB
    • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, JanPB
      • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Androcles
    • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Igor
    • Message not available
      • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Koobee Wublee
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality", Olp
• 102nd Birthday of E=mc2 ( 27 Sep 1905- 27 Sep.2007) Complete tribute in book Einstein's E=mc2 generalized , www.ajayonline.us, watchs
• Re: E = mc˛ ... 102nd birthday of a well covered up plagiarism by the Einstein Retard, Pmb
  • Re: E = mc² ... 102nd birthday of a well covered up plagiarism by the Einstein Retard, Koobee Wublee
• Re: USM, Pmb
• Black holes and relativity, j . wesley . cleveland
  • Re: Black holes and relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Eric Baird
  • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Pmb
  • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Eric Gisse
    • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Eric Baird
      • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Pmb
  • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Eric Baird
      • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), shuba
      • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Dono
      • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Eric Baird
  • Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), xxein
• johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 3, September 27, 2007, johnlawrencereedjr
• A new conjecture on small scale gravity, Jack Sarfatti
• johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007, Bill Hobba
    • Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007, johnlawrencereedjr
• How did Einstein get published?, Randy Poe
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?, JM Albuquerque
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Eric Gisse
  • Message not available
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?, greysky
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, watchs
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Pmb
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Message not available
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Randy Poe
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, PhaseSpace R8
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Randy Poe
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Pmb
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Pmb
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
      • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
  • Re: How did Einstein get published?, PhaseSpaceR8@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
• "A Basic Look at the Aether", Olp
  • Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether", mh
• Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Examining g0i, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what is a theory of everything?, xxein
  • Re: what is a theory of everything?, Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: what is a theory of everything?, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: what is a theory of everything?, Jeckyl
  • Re: what is a theory of everything?, Igor
    • Message not available
      • Re: what is a theory of everything?, Igor
      • Message not available
      • Re: what is a theory of everything?, xxein
• Re: even droplets says relativity is wrong, xxein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: even droplets says relativity is wrong, Tom Roberts
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Martin Hogbin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Jeckyl
    • Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Pmb
      • Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Pmb
  • Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, JanPB
    • Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Jeckyl
• "Is String Theory Justified?", Olp
  • Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• One time offer. New picture of the World, total advanced physic with no math (not believe this so fast)., John . Dabro
• question about photon centre of mass reference frames, tony . hartin
  • Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames, Androcles
  • Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames, jcon
  • Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames, Andreas Most
    • Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames, Andreas Most
  • Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames, valls
• Re: tha importance of a finger in relativity, Don Stockbauer
• Please fill me in on shuba, Pmb
  • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, shalayka
    • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Pmb
      • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, shalayka
  • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Juan R.
    • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Pmb
    • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Shubee
  • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Jerry
    • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Pmb
  • Re: Please fill me in on shuba, sal
• Re: Relativity Question, relativityquestion
  • Re: Relativity Question, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Relativity Question, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, jcon
    • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, jcon
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, jcon
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, jcon
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, dlzc
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, dlzc
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
      • Re: Other kook newsgroups?, dlzc
• What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: What is science?, darke
    • Re: What is science?, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: What is science?, PD
    • Re: What is science?, Pmb
      • Re: What is science?, Randy Poe
    • Re: What is science?, harry
      • Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: What is science?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: What is science?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: What is science?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: What is science?, harry
      • Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: What is science?, harry
      • Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
• Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
  • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, kk
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dono
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, THE_ONE
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, OG
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, THE_ONE
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
    • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dono
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dono
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, PD
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
  • Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
• Quadrupole magnets also cause Synchrotron radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, PD
    • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Androcles
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, PD
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Androcles
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Randy Poe
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Eric Gisse
• Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
  • Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
    • Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), harry
      • Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
  • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), T.M. Sommers
    • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), shuba
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), harry
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), shuba
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), harry
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), shuba
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Androcles
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), harry
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), JM Albuquerque
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), pmb
  • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Eric Gisse
  • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), JM Albuquerque
    • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), JM Albuquerque
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Eric Gisse
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Suri
• Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2, Pmb
  • Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2, Jeckyl
    • Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2, Pmb
• Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, oksis@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, G. L. Bradford
    • Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, Uwe Hayek
    • Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, PD
• Universe not expanding perhaps due to Warped Space and Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
  • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
    • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, JM Albuquerque
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
      • Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
• Part E: The more distant the stars, the larger the Coriolis EFFECT., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Part D: Universe not expanding perhaps due to MULTIPLE Spirals., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Part C: Gravity + velocity causes spiralling, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed, Igor
    • Re: Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: expanding in it self?, xxein
• Re: main postulate for relativity, xxein
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, xxein
    • Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, OG
  • Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, shalayka
• Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
  • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Androcles
  • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
    • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, PD
    • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, PD
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, PD
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shuba
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shuba
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
      • Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, bz
• Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
  • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Androcles
  • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Uwe Hayek
  • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Androcles
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, dlzc
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, shuba
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
    • Message not available
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2, xxein
    • Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2, johnlawrencereedjr
• "The Arrow of Time", Suri
• Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force., Dono
    • Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force., jcon
    • Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force., OG
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?, Androcles
    • Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?, Don Stockbauer
• Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light, xxein
  • Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light, Pmb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light, Igor
• Re: speed of light is not non-volatile, xxein
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Suri
• Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
  • Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
    • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
      • Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
  • Re: Was Zwicky right?, kenseto
• Question (flashlight falling from the sky), nobody1357
  • Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), nobody1357
      • Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), dlzc
      • Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), bz
  • Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), sal
  • Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Spin 1 vector torsion and curvature fields in substratum of geometrodynamics, Jack Sarfatti
• IaSNe (revised), dwhig265
  • Re: IaSNe (revised), dwhig265
    • Re: IaSNe (revised), Androcles
    • Re: IaSNe (revised), xxein
      • Re: IaSNe (revised), dwhig265
      • Re: IaSNe (revised), Silverste39
      • Re: IaSNe (revised), dwhig265
  • Re: IaSNe (revised), Androcles
  • Re: IaSNe (revised), Silverste39
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Suri
• Androcles' discussion of MMX, Alex
  • Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Androcles
  • Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Jeckyl
      • Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Pmb
      • Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Androcles
      • Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Androcles
• No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, jcon
    • Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, jcon
    • Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, Eric Gisse
      • Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, Randy Poe
      • Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation, Androcles
• Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, T.M. Sommers
    • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, jcon
    • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, jcon
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Dead Paul
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Randy Poe
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Androcles
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Randy Poe
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Androcles
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Randy Poe
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Androcles
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, jcon
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, PD
    • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Androcles
    • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, PD
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, PD
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, PD
      • Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Missis Erica Gisse knows nothing of Quantum Mechanics, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Missis Erica Gisse knows nothing of Quantum Mechanics, Jeckyl
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Suri
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
    • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Y.Porat
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Jeckyl
  • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
    • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Jeckyl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", xxein
    • Message not available
      • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", xxein
      • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", THE_ONE
      • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Jeckyl
      • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", THE_ONE
      • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Jeckyl
  • Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Igor
• Re: was relativity faked?, Pmb
  • Message not available
    • Re: was relativity faked?, Jeckyl
      • Re: was relativity faked?, Pmb
  • Message not available
    • Re: was relativity faked?, Pmb
      • Re: was relativity faked?, Pmb
      • Re: was relativity faked?, xxein
      • Re: was relativity faked?, coil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: was relativity faked?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: was relativity faked?, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
      • Re: was relativity faked?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: was relativity faked?, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
  • Re: was relativity faked?, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
  • Re: was relativity faked?, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: was relativity faked?, Androcles
• fixed stars, dwhig265
  • Re: fixed stars, Androcles
    • Re: fixed stars, dwhig265
      • Re: fixed stars, Androcles
      • Re: fixed stars, dwhig265
      • Re: fixed stars, Androcles
  • Re: fixed stars, dlzc
  • Re: fixed stars, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• iaSNe, dwhig265
  • Re: iaSNe, dlzc
    • Re: iaSNe, dwhig265
      • Re: iaSNe, Pmb
      • Re: iaSNe, dwhig265
      • Re: iaSNe, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: iaSNe, dwhig265
      • Re: iaSNe, dlzc
      • Re: iaSNe, dwhig265
      • Re: iaSNe, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: iaSNe, Dono
  • Re: iaSNe, Dono
• Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, JanPB
    • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, Igor
    • Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: WERE EINSTEIN AND EDDINGTON INNOCENT?, Shubee
• super c velocity, vertvergon
  • Re: super c velocity, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: super c velocity, Shubee
    • Re: super c velocity, Jeckyl
      • Re: super c velocity, Shubee
      • Re: super c velocity, Jeckyl
      • Re: super c velocity, Shubee
      • Re: super c velocity, Jeckyl
      • Re: super c velocity, Shubee
    • Re: super c velocity, Eric Gisse
    • Re: super c velocity, vertvergon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Super c velocity, vertvergon
    • Re: Super c velocity, Androcles
• Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
  • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
    • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, sal
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
  • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Uwe Hayek
    • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
  • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, harry
    • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, dlzc
      • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, harry
• Gravity and torsion as Yang-Mills local gauge theory, Jack Sarfatti
• Can't figure out why there's no radiaiton in the following trajectory, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Can't figure out why there's no radiaiton in the following trajectory, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Can't figure out why there's no radiaiton in the following trajectory, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Eser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Olp
    • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Pmb
• Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Uwe Hayek
    • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Uwe Hayek
      • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Stochastic Electrodynamics Theory states Electron orbits and ends Higgs Field, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Stochastic Electrodynamics Theory states Electron orbits and ends Higgs Field, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
    • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., jan . bielawski
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Randy Poe
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., jan . bielawski
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Androcles
  • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
  • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Dono
    • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Dono
      • Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Androcles
    • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Androcles
• Re: relativity is bifurcated, RLG
  • Message not available
    • Re: relativity is bifurcated, RLG
      • Re: relativity is bifurcated, Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 177.0: Polynomials Identified As x -y Differences By Chinese, OsherD
• Is it perfect math of what keeps the electrons from leaving an atom?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is it perfect math of what keeps the electrons from leaving an atom?, Josef Matz
• Uncertainty principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Uncertainty principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Uncertainty principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around, Igor
    • Re: Uncertainty principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around, Eric Gisse
• Uncertain principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
  • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
    • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
  • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Yogurt
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
    • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Dono
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Dono
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, mluttgens
  • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, sal
    • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, sal
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, schoenfeld . one
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, schoenfeld . one
      • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, schoenfeld . one
    • Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
• Meaning of the spin connection coefficients & Lie algebra structure constants, Jack Sarfatti
• The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
  • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Eric Gisse
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Dono
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Dono
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Dono
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Dono
      • Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Randy Poe
      • Re: The Value of T