sci.physics.relativity
- Re: they want me to accept his tensors, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Yang-Mills substratum of Quantum Foam, Jack Sarfatti
- Quantum Foam, Jack Sarfatti
- Yang-Mills version of General Relativity's renormalizable substratum, Jack Sarfatti
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Eric Gisse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Jerry
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Androcles
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Dirk Van de moortel
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh., Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Three Time Puzzles, Bill Hobba
- Re: Three Time Puzzles,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Three Time Puzzles,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Three Time Puzzles, John Jones
- Re: Three Time Puzzles, Simple Simon
- Re: Three Time Puzzles,
John Jones
- Re: Three Time Puzzles, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Three Time Puzzles,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Three Time Puzzles,
Androcles
- Re: Three Time Puzzles,
John Jones
- Re: Three Time Puzzles, Androcles
- Re: Three Time Puzzles, John Jones
- Re: Three Time Puzzles, Androcles
- Re: Three Time Puzzles,
John Jones
- Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Pmb
- Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?, Louis_N
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: the brain of einstein, Igor
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Igor
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
JanPB
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Don Stockbauer
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
JanPB
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Androcles
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Igor
- Message not available
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors, Koobee Wublee
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
JanPB
- Re: Black holes and relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Pmb
- Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Eric Gisse
- Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ), xxein
- Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007,
Bill Hobba
- Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007, johnlawrencereedjr
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
greysky
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, watchs
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Pmb
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Ken S. Tucker
- Message not available
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Randy Poe
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, PhaseSpace R8
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Randy Poe
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, jcon
- Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Koobee Wublee
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Koobee Wublee
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
- Message not available
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Pmb
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Pmb
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Tom Roberts
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Dono
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?, Androcles
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
- Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
- Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i, Tom Roberts
- Re: Examining g0i, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: what is a theory of everything?, Jeckyl
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: what is a theory of everything?,
Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: what is a theory of everything?,
Igor
- Message not available
- Re: what is a theory of everything?, Igor
- Message not available
- Re: what is a theory of everything?, xxein
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: even droplets says relativity is wrong, Tom Roberts
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, Jeckyl
- Re: How many here have been institutionalized?, JanPB
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Please fill me in on shuba,
shalayka
- Re: Please fill me in on shuba,
Pmb
- Re: Please fill me in on shuba, shalayka
- Re: Please fill me in on shuba,
Pmb
- Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Eric Gisse
- Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Juan R.
- Re: Please fill me in on shuba, Jerry
- Re: Please fill me in on shuba, sal
- Re: Relativity Question, schoenfeld . one
- Re: Relativity Question, Dirk Van de moortel
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?,
jcon
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?,
Pmb
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, jcon
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, jcon
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, jcon
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, dlzc
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, dlzc
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, Pmb
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?, dlzc
- Re: Other kook newsgroups?,
Pmb
- Re: What is science?,
darke
- Re: What is science?, Don Stockbauer
- Re: What is science?,
PD
- Re: What is science?,
Pmb
- Re: What is science?, Randy Poe
- Re: What is science?,
harry
- Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What is science?, Jeckyl
- Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What is science?, Jeckyl
- Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What is science?, Jeckyl
- Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What is science?, harry
- Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What is science?, harry
- Re: What is science?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What is science?,
Pmb
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, kk
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dono
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, THE_ONE
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, OG
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, THE_ONE
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dono
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dono
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, PD
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Androcles
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Androcles
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself, Jeckyl
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation,
PD
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation,
Androcles
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, PD
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Androcles
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Eric Gisse
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Randy Poe
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Jerry
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation, Eric Gisse
- Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation,
Androcles
- Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju),
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju),
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), shuba
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), harry
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), shuba
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), harry
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), shuba
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Androcles
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), harry
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), JM Albuquerque
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju),
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Eric Gisse
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju),
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju),
Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), JM Albuquerque
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Eric Gisse
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju), Pmb
- Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju),
Pmb
- Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?,
oksis@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?, Uwe Hayek
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism,
Eric Gisse
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism,
Pmb
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Jerry
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, JM Albuquerque
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Pmb
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism, Eric Gisse
- Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism,
Pmb
- Re: Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed,
Igor
- Re: Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, Eric Gisse
- Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?,
xxein
- Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, Eric Gisse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, OG
- Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Androcles
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime,
shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Eric Gisse
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Bill Hobba
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, Bill Hobba
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime,
shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime,
PD
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime,
shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, PD
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, PD
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shuba
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shuba
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, shalayka
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime, bz
- Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime,
shalayka
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Androcles
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Uwe Hayek
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession,
John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Androcles
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, dlzc
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, shuba
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Bill Hobba
- Message not available
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Message not available
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Message not available
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Message not available
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Message not available
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession, John Jones
- Re: Time can be described without duration and succession,
John Jones
- Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light, Pmb
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light, Igor
- Re: Was Zwicky right?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?,
mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, mluttgens
- Re: Was Zwicky right?, kenseto
- Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), sal
- Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky), Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: IaSNe (revised),
dwhig265
- Re: IaSNe (revised), Androcles
- Re: IaSNe (revised),
xxein
- Re: IaSNe (revised), dwhig265
- Re: IaSNe (revised), Silverste39
- Re: IaSNe (revised), dwhig265
- Re: IaSNe (revised), Androcles
- Re: IaSNe (revised), Silverste39
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Androcles
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX,
Jeckyl
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Pmb
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Androcles
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX, Androcles
- Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX,
Jeckyl
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law,
jcon
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law,
Dead Paul
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Randy Poe
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Androcles
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Randy Poe
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Androcles
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Randy Poe
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Androcles
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, jcon
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law,
PD
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, Androcles
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, PD
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, PD
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, PD
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!,
Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!,
Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Y.Porat
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Randy Poe
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Androcles
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, bz
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Message not available
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!, Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!,
Jeckyl
- Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity",
xxein
- Message not available
- Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", xxein
- Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", THE_ONE
- Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Jeckyl
- Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", THE_ONE
- Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity", Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: was relativity faked?, Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: was relativity faked?,
Pmb
- Re: was relativity faked?, Pmb
- Re: was relativity faked?, xxein
- Re: was relativity faked?, coil
- Re: was relativity faked?,
Pmb
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: was relativity faked?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: was relativity faked?,
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: was relativity faked?, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: was relativity faked?, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: was relativity faked?,
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: was relativity faked?, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: was relativity faked?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: was relativity faked?, Androcles
- Re: fixed stars,
Androcles
- Re: fixed stars,
dwhig265
- Re: fixed stars, Androcles
- Re: fixed stars, dwhig265
- Re: fixed stars, Androcles
- Re: fixed stars,
dwhig265
- Re: fixed stars, dlzc
- Re: fixed stars, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA,
JanPB
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, Eric Gisse
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, Eric Gisse
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA,
Igor
- Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: super c velocity, Don Stockbauer
- Re: super c velocity,
Shubee
- Re: super c velocity,
Jeckyl
- Re: super c velocity, Shubee
- Re: super c velocity, Jeckyl
- Re: super c velocity, Shubee
- Re: super c velocity, Jeckyl
- Re: super c velocity, Shubee
- Re: super c velocity, Eric Gisse
- Re: super c velocity, vertvergon
- Re: super c velocity,
Jeckyl
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Super c velocity,
vertvergon
- Re: Super c velocity, Androcles
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?,
Pmb
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?,
xray4abc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, sal
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?,
xray4abc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?,
Uwe Hayek
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, xray4abc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?,
harry
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?,
xray4abc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Pmb
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Tom Roberts
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, dlzc
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?, harry
- Re: Is there a relativistic mass?,
xray4abc
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Olp
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Uwe Hayek
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Eric Gisse
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, Eric Gisse
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.,
JanPB
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., jan . bielawski
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Randy Poe
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Koobee Wublee
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., JanPB
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., jan . bielawski
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Androcles
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., Eric Gisse
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.,
Dono
- Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Androcles
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", The Ghost In The Machine
- Message not available
- Re: relativity is bifurcated,
RLG
- Re: relativity is bifurcated, Androcles
- Re: relativity is bifurcated,
RLG
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
Androcles
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
Yogurt
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
shalayka
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Dono
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Dono
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, mluttgens
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
Yogurt
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
sal
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, sal
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, shalayka
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Tom Roberts
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Androcles
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Eric Gisse
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, JanPB
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, schoenfeld . one
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, schoenfeld . one
- Re: Path in Schwarzschild, schoenfeld . one
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent,
Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent,
Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent,
kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Dono
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Dono
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Dono
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Dono
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Randy Poe
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Draper family
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent,
kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Randy Poe
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Randy Poe
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Randy Poe
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent,
kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Randy Poe
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, Jeckyl
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, kenseto
- Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent, PD
- Re: Biblical time table fot the destruction of Atheism, Dirk Van de moortel
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Biblical time table fot the destruction of Atheism, Igor
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle,
dlzc
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle,
Randy Poe
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle,
Randy Poe
- Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle, Igor
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space,
Tom Roberts
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space,
roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, John C . Polasek
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, Bill Hobba
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space,
roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, harry
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, Uwe Hayek
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, Igor
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space,
Bill Hobba
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, Don Stockbauer
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space,
roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, Bill Hobba
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, Bill Hobba
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, Bill Hobba
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, Bill Hobba
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, bz
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, roberto neves
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space, G. L. Bradford
- Message not available
- Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old,
Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old, Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old, Jeckyl
- Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old,
Jeckyl
- Re: Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle, Igor
- Re: Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle,
Paul Cardinale
- Message not available
- Re: Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle, Paul Cardinale
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, JanPB
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, Androcles
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, Jeckyl
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, JanPB
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, Jeckyl
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, PD
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity, PD
- Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Variable inertia., Androcles
- Re: Variable inertia., Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Variable inertia.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Variable inertia.,
Uwe Hayek
- Re: Variable inertia., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Variable inertia.,
Uwe Hayek
- Re: Variable inertia.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Variable inertia.,
Pmb
- Re: Variable inertia., JM Albuquerque
- Re: Variable inertia., Pmb
- Re: Variable inertia., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Variable inertia., Pmb
- Re: Variable inertia., Uwe Hayek
- Re: Variable inertia.,
Pmb
- Re: Variable inertia.,
harry
- Re: Variable inertia.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Variable inertia., Uwe Hayek
- Re: Variable inertia., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Variable inertia., Uwe Hayek
- Re: Variable inertia., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Variable inertia.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Variable inertia., Igor
- Re: Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME., Jeckyl
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition,
Igor
- Re: Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Quantum Geometry,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Quantum Geometry,
schoenfeld . one
- Re: Quantum Geometry, Bill Hobba
- Re: Quantum Geometry,
schoenfeld . one
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Vern
- Re: Debunking Nimtz, Tom Roberts
- Re: Debunking Nimtz, Juan R.
- Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Vern
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.,
dlzc
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron., dlzc
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron., dlzc
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Note to all the world.,
meda
- Re: Note to all the world., Jeckyl
- Re: Note to all the world.,
dlzc
- Re: Note to all the world.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Note to all the world., Jeckyl
- Re: Note to all the world., dlzc
- Re: Note to all the world., Martin Hogbin
- Message not available
- Re: Note to all the world., Jeckyl
- Re: Note to all the world.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Note to all the world.,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Note to all the world.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Note to all the world., Paul Cardinale
- Re: Note to all the world., PD
- Re: Note to all the world., Tom Roberts
- Re: Note to all the world., PD
- Re: Note to all the world., Androcles
- Re: Note to all the world., Tom Roberts
- Re: Note to all the world., harry
- Re: Note to all the world., Koobee Wublee
- Re: Note to all the world., Eric Gisse
- Re: Note to all the world., Androcles
- Re: Note to all the world., Koobee Wublee
- Re: Note to all the world., Eric Gisse
- Re: Note to all the world., Pmb
- Re: Note to all the world., Eric Gisse
- Re: Note to all the world., Pmb
- Re: Note to all the world., PD
- Re: Note to all the world., Androcles
- Re: Note to all the world.,
harry
- Re: Note to all the world., Jeckyl
- Re: Note to all the world.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Note to all the world.,
Jeckyl
- Re: Note to all the world.,
harry
- Re: Note to all the world., Pmb
- Re: Note to all the world., harry
- Re: Note to all the world., Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Note to all the world., Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: Note to all the world., Jeckyl
- Re: Note to all the world.,
harry
- Re: speeds higher than speed of light imposible not to exists,
Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors,
Jeckyl
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors, Jeckyl
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors, Igor
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors, Jeckyl
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors, Jeckyl
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors, Jeckyl
- Re: All dimensions are time vectors,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction, Jeckyl
- Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction,
dlzc
- Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection,
Jeckyl
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, Jeckyl
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, Eric Gisse
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, Eric Gisse
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, Jeckyl
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, Eric Gisse
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, Jeckyl
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, PD
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, PD
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Androcles
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Jeckyl
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, harry
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Randy Poe
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, harry
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, harry
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, bz
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, bz
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Jeckyl
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, harry
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Martin Hogbin
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Androcles
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Alen
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, Paul Cardinale
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, harry
- Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?, sal
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, harry
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, harry
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, harry
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Thomas Heger
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Dono
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, bz
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Tom Roberts
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity, Andreas Most
- Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity,
Koobee Wublee
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: how to define another universe, of other type, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
xxein
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Don Stockbauer
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", xray4abc
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Does Androcles have a theory?, Androcles
- Re: Does Androcles have a theory?, Androcles
- Re: Does Androcles have a theory?,
Shubee
- Re: Does Androcles have a theory?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Does Androcles have a theory?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Q re GR, Jeckyl
- Re: Q re GR, Bill Hobba
- Re: space is infinitely rigid, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Einstein's idea is right, xxein
- Re: Einstein's idea is right,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's idea is right,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein's idea is right, Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's idea is right, Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's idea is right, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein's idea is right,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein's idea is right, harry
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, xxein
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Tom Roberts
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM,
Bill Hobba
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Stamenin
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, JM Albuquerque
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Bill Hobba
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Bill Hobba
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM,
harry
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Don Stockbauer
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, shuba
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM,
Shubee
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM,
Bill Hobba
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Stamenin
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, JM Albuquerque
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Stamenin
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, JM Albuquerque
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Stamenin
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, JM Albuquerque
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Bill Hobba
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, Shubee
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM,
Bill Hobba
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM,
Pmb
- Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD,
Igor
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD, Igor
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD, Igor
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD, Eric Gisse
- Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory.,
Jeckyl
- Re: This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines,
Igor
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, Igor
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, Eric Gisse
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, Igor
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, Igor
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Do waves emit spectral lines, Androcles
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Don Stockbauer
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now,
Randy Poe
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now,
Jeckyl
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Jeckyl
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Jeckyl
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Eric Gisse
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Eric Gisse
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Eric Gisse
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Jeckyl
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Jeckyl
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Jeckyl
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Jeckyl
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, Eric Gisse
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula,
Randy Poe
- Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula, Dono
- Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula, Igor
- Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula, meda
- Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, meda
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
meda
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
meda
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
Tom Roberts
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Dono
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
Tom Roberts
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
Tom Roberts
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
meda
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Daryl McCullough
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, T.M. Sommers
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, meda
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Daryl McCullough
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, T.M. Sommers
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, T.M. Sommers
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Eric Gisse
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Koobee Wublee
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, meda
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, JanPB
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong, Androcles
- Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong,
meda
- Re: he can not do this, Mdmeenken
- Re: he can not do this, Jeckyl
- Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?,
The TimeLord
- Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A Great Soap Opera!, The TimeLord
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns,
dlzc
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, Paul Cardinale
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns,
Igor
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, Igor
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, Igor
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, Igor
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns, Jeckyl
- Re: Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID,
meda
- Re: Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID,
The TimeLord
- Re: Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,,
Leonard Abbott
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, Leonard Abbott
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, The TimeLord
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, Leonard Abbott
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, The TimeLord
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,,
Leonard Abbott
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,,
kk
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,,
Eric Gisse
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, The TimeLord
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, Eric Gisse
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, kk
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, Eric Gisse
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, kk
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,,
Bill Hobba
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, The TimeLord
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, The TimeLord
- Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,, Igor
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Paul Cardinale
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, JanPB
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula,
Igor
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula,
John C . Polasek
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula,
The TimeLord
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, The TimeLord
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula,
The TimeLord
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula,
Ken S. Tucker
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, meda
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, meda
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, meda
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, meda
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, meda
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Message not available
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shalayka
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shuba
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shuba
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Androcles
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, shuba
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, schoenfeld . one
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Jerry
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Daryl McCullough
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, JM Albuquerque
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, JM Albuquerque
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Koobee Wublee
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, JM Albuquerque
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, JM Albuquerque
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Tom Roberts
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Daryl McCullough
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Randy Poe
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Androcles
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation,
aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, sal
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, Martin Hogbin
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time dilation, The TimeLord
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, Androcles
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, Androcles
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, Androcles
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, Androcles
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation,
meda
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, The TimeLord
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, Sue...
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, Sue...
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, Sue...
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, Sue...
- Re: Time dilation, bz
- Re: Time dilation, Spirit of Truth
- Re: Time dilation, Jeckyl
- Re: Time dilation,
aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation,
harry
- Re: Time dilation,
aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation,
meda
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, dlzc
- Re: Time dilation, harry
- Re: Time dilation, Androcles
- Re: Time dilation,
aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation,
Androcles
- Re: Time dilation,
BernardZ
- Re: Time dilation, meda
- Re: Time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Time dilation, Androcles
- Re: Time dilation, BernardZ
- Re: Time dilation, Androcles
- Re: Time dilation, aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, bernardz
- Re: Time dilation, Jeckyl
- Re: Time dilation,
BernardZ
- Re: Time dilation,
THE_ONE
- Re: Time dilation,
aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, Eric Gisse
- Re: Time dilation,
aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time dilation, Dono
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: is light only a 2nd order model? why not more?, Tom Roberts
- Re: is light only a 2nd order model? why not more?, xxein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How can a Black Hole be hollow?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Randy refuses to acknowlege his own web link.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures,
Randy Poe
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Jeckyl
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Jeckyl
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Jeckyl
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Randy Poe
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Jeckyl
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Randy Poe
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Jeckyl
- Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures, Eric Gisse
- Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures,
Randy Poe
- Re: Randy refuses to acknowlege his own web link.,
Randy Poe
- Re: Randy refuses to acknowlege his own web link., guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: How to Bake an Apple Pie!,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: How to Bake an Apple Pie!, Androcles
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?, Chris
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?,
dlzc
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?, dlzc
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?,
Chris
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, THE_ONE
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?,
T.M. Sommers
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, T.M. Sommers
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, Eric Gisse
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, Eric Gisse
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, T.M. Sommers
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, Jeckyl
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, Eric Gisse
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: where are the breakthroughs?, JanPB
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle,
Eric Gisse
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, Eric Gisse
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, Eric Gisse
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, Eric Gisse
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, John Park
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, John Park
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, Randy Poe
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Message not available
- Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Message not available
- Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Message not available
- Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: SpaceTime & memory.,
Leonard Abbott
- Re: SpaceTime & memory., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: SpaceTime & memory.,
Thomas Heger
- Re: SpaceTime & memory., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: SpaceTime & memory.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: SpaceTime & memory., bz
- Re: SpaceTime & memory., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative,
Igor
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative,
Leonard Abbott
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative, Bill Hobba
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative Bill, Leonard Abbott
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative Bill, Eric Gisse
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative Bill, Bill Hobba
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative, Igor
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative,
Leonard Abbott
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative, Jeckyl
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 6 FACTS why Relativists are a bunch of liars, Pmb
- Message not available
- Re: Strong gravitational fields,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Strong gravitational fields, Eric Gisse
- Re: Strong gravitational fields,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: relativity extinct the bees,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: relativity extinct the bees, sal
- Re: relativity extinct the bees, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: relativity extinct the bees, dlzc
- Re: relativity extinct the bees, Don Stockbauer
- Re: relativity extinct the bees, sal
- Re: relativity extinct the bees, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: relativity extinct the bees,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Message not available
- Re: another proof, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: another proof, Jeckyl
- Re: another proof,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: another proof, PD
- Message not available
- Re: another proof, PD
- Message not available
- Re: another proof, PD
- Message not available
- Re: another proof, PD
- Message not available
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR,
PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR,
kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Tom Roberts
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, PD
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, RLG
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, kenseto
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR, Jeckyl
- Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR,
kenseto
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Androcles
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Eric Gisse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?,
Igor
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Randy Poe
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Randy Poe
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Randy Poe
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Androcles
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Randy Poe
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Randy Poe
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Randy Poe
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?, John Park
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Don Stockbauer
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?",
kenseto
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Don Stockbauer
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?",
John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Darwin123
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Androcles
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Don Stockbauer
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Pmb
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Pmb
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Pmb
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Pmb
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", bz
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", bz
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Pmb
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Pmb
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Pmb
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Androcles
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", JM Albuquerque
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", JM Albuquerque
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", JM Albuquerque
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Pmb
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", bz
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", bz
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", bz
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", bz
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", bz
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", xray4abc
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Jeckyl
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", JM Albuquerque
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", maxwell
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Tom Roberts
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Alex
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", John Kennaugh
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", shuba
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Don Stockbauer
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: relativity is the dark age of science, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: relativity is the dark age of science, Tom Roberts
- Re: relativity is the dark age of science, Igor
- Re: What is the science for SR and LET?,
Jeckyl
- Re: What is the science for SR and LET?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What is the science for SR and LET?, PD
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What is the science for SR and LET?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: why not video record all experiments?, sal
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Eric Gisse
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Josef Matz
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Koobee Wublee
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Tom Roberts
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Koobee Wublee
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Eric Gisse
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Josef Matz
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Tom Roberts
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Josef Matz
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Josef Matz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Josef Matz
- Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form., Josef Matz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Equivalence Principle Question,
eugene_stefanovich
- Re: Equivalence Principle Question, John C . Polasek
- Re: Equivalence Principle Question, Martin Hogbin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Understanding Einstein, Randy Poe
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.,
Jeckyl
- Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.,
Pmb
- Relativity.changed Science into science fiction, Leonard Abbott
- Re: Relativity.changed Science into science fiction, Jeckyl
- Re: Relativity.changed Science into science fiction, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.,
Pmb
- Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity., Paul B. Andersen
- Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity., xray4abc
- Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity., vanep
- Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.,
vanep
- Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity., Androcles
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
JanPB
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Androcles
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, JanPB
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Androcles
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Androcles
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Message not available
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, PD
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, PD
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, PD
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, shuba
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, shuba
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Message not available
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?,
harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?, harry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: after 100 years of relativity, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
- Re: after 100 years of relativity,
maxwell
- Re: after 100 years of relativity, Androcles
- Re: after 100 years of relativity, Don Stockbauer
- Re: after 100 years of relativity, bz
- Re: after 100 years of relativity, Igor
- Re: after 100 years of relativity, Leonard Abbott
- <Possible follow-ups>
- <spam>,
JanPB
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", JanPB
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Androcles
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", JanPB
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Androcles
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Don Stockbauer
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", The Ghost In The Machine
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1",
Koobee Wublee
Loading
