sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: they want me to accept his tensors
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Igor
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Pmb
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: valls
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Yang-Mills version of General Relativity's renormalizable substratum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Yang-Mills substratum of Quantum Foam
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Quantum Foam
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Yang-Mills version of General Relativity's renormalizable substratum
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: dwhig265
• Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: PhaseSpace R8
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: PhaseSpaceR8@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: the brain of einstein
  • From: Igor
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Igor
• "Causality"
  • From: Olp
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: E = mc² ... 102nd birthday of a well covered up plagiarism by the Einstein Retard
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: Silverste39
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: Silverste39
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Dono
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: valls
• Re: Black holes and relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: can universe make sense?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: xxein
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: valls
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Pmb
• What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: valls
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the brain of einstein
  • From: xxein
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: xxein
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: xxein
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: shuba
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: watchs
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Olp
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: greysky
• 102nd Birthday of E=mc2 ( 27 Sep 1905- 27 Sep.2007) Complete tribute in book Einstein's E=mc2 generalized , www.ajayonline.us
  • From: watchs
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: E = mc˛ ... 102nd birthday of a well covered up plagiarism by the Einstein Retard
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: USM
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Black holes and relativity
  • From: j . wesley . cleveland
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 3, September 27, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: shuba
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• A new conjecture on small scale gravity
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: mh
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: sal
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: even droplets says relativity is wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Randy Poe
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Olp
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: valls
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: xxein
• Re: even droplets says relativity is wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: bz
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Shubee
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: PD
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: jcon
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: shuba
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• One time offer. New picture of the World, total advanced physic with no math (not believe this so fast).
  • From: John . Dabro
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Jerry
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: Androcles
• question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: tony . hartin
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: harry
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: tha importance of a finger in relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: pmb
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: relativityquestion
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shuba
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shuba
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: OG
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: shuba
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: kk
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What is science?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: harry
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: harry
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What is science?
  • From: darke
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: PD
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Quadrupole magnets also cause Synchrotron radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: oksis@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: shuba
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Suri
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Universe not expanding perhaps due to Warped Space and Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Part E: The more distant the stars, the larger the Coriolis EFFECT.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Part D: Universe not expanding perhaps due to MULTIPLE Spirals.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Part C: Gravity + velocity causes spiralling
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2
  • From: xxein
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: xxein
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: expanding in it self?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: OG
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: OG
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: main postulate for relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Androcles
• Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light
  • From: Igor
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: jcon
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Suri
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: jcon
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: bz
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: Dono
• Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: PD
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light
  • From: Pmb
• Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light
  • From: xxein
• Re: speed of light is not non-volatile
  • From: xxein
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: bz
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: jcon
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Dono
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Suri
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: sal
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: bz
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Spin 1 vector torsion and curvature fields in substratum of geometrodynamics
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: xxein
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Dono
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: PD
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• IaSNe (revised)
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: jcon
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law