sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: they want me to accept his tensors
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Igor
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Pmb
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: valls
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Yang-Mills version of General Relativity's renormalizable substratum
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Yang-Mills substratum of Quantum Foam
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Quantum Foam
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Yang-Mills version of General Relativity's renormalizable substratum
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: dwhig265
• Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: PhaseSpace R8
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: PhaseSpaceR8@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: the brain of einstein
  • From: Igor
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Igor
• "Causality"
  • From: Olp
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: E = mc² ... 102nd birthday of a well covered up plagiarism by the Einstein Retard
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: Silverste39
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: Silverste39
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Dono
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: valls
• Re: Black holes and relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: can universe make sense?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: xxein
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: valls
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Pmb
• What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: valls
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the brain of einstein
  • From: xxein
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: xxein
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: xxein
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: shuba
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: jcon
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: watchs
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Olp
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: greysky
• 102nd Birthday of E=mc2 ( 27 Sep 1905- 27 Sep.2007) Complete tribute in book Einstein's E=mc2 generalized , www.ajayonline.us
  • From: watchs
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: E = mc˛ ... 102nd birthday of a well covered up plagiarism by the Einstein Retard
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: USM
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Black holes and relativity
  • From: j . wesley . cleveland
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 3, September 27, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: shuba
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• A new conjecture on small scale gravity
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: mh
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: sal
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: even droplets says relativity is wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Randy Poe
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Olp
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: valls
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: xxein
• Re: even droplets says relativity is wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: bz
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many here have been institutionalized?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Shubee
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: PD
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: jcon
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: shuba
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• One time offer. New picture of the World, total advanced physic with no math (not believe this so fast).
  • From: John . Dabro
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Jerry
• Re: question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: Androcles
• question about photon centre of mass reference frames
  • From: tony . hartin
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: harry
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: tha importance of a finger in relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Please fill me in on shuba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: pmb
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: relativityquestion
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shuba
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shuba
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: OG
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Other kook newsgroups?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: shuba
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: kk
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What is science?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: harry
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: harry
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What is science?
  • From: darke
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• What is science?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: PD
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Quadrupole magnets also cause Synchrotron radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: bz
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: oksis@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: shuba
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: How does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Ho does one report someone to their ISP? (Rhetic = bad juju)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Suri
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Energy of photon released by the electron in a hydrogen atom No 2
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Big Bang's location perhaps still observable?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Universe not expanding perhaps due to Warped Space and Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• hanson - Insult vs Criticism
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Part E: The more distant the stars, the larger the Coriolis EFFECT.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Part D: Universe not expanding perhaps due to MULTIPLE Spirals.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Part C: Gravity + velocity causes spiralling
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Part B: Uniform spirallig Universe goes unoticed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2
  • From: xxein
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Universe not expanding perhaps due to Coriolis effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: xxein
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: expanding in it self?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: OG
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: OG
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: main postulate for relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Do Pencho and Androcles have jobs?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Investigating the Plasticity of Spacetime
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: Androcles
• Time can be described without duration and succession
  • From: John Jones
• Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light
  • From: Igor
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: jcon
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Suri
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: jcon
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: bz
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: Dono
• Synchrotron Radiation, they can't comprehend meaning of Normal Force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: PD
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light
  • From: Pmb
• Re: speed of metal is higher than speed of light
  • From: xxein
• Re: speed of light is not non-volatile
  • From: xxein
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Zwicky right?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: bz
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: jcon
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Dono
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Suri
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: sal
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: bz
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Was Zwicky right?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Question (flashlight falling from the sky)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Spin 1 vector torsion and curvature fields in substratum of geometrodynamics
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: xxein
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Dono
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: PD
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: IaSNe (revised)
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• IaSNe (revised)
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: jcon
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Dono
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: bz
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Suri
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Androcles' discussion of MMX
  • From: Alex
• Re: Super c velocity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: harry
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Super c velocity
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Missis Erica Gisse knows nothing of Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: xxein
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: jcon
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: coil
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: Dono
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: jcon
• No energy lost in orbits thus no Synchroton radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: Igor
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: Igor
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: JanPB
• Synchrotron Radiation a blasphemy to Newton's law
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Missis Erica Gisse knows nothing of Quantum Mechanics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Dono
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Suri
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: fixed stars
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Alex
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: harry
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Dono
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: xxein
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: xxein
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: Pmb
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why "special relativity" while she is rather "wrong relativity"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: iaSNe
  • From: dlzc
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: fixed stars
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: fixed stars
  • From: dlzc
• Re: fixed stars
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: fixed stars
  • From: Androcles
• Re: was relativity faked?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: fixed stars
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: fixed stars
  • From: Androcles
• fixed stars
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: sal
• iaSNe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• <spam>
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: jan . bielawski
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: jan . bielawski
• Poynting's theorem is INERTIA
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Can't figure out why there's no radiaiton in the following trajectory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: WERE EINSTEIN AND EDDINGTON INNOCENT?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Alex
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Alex
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: shuba
• Re: super c velocity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• super c velocity
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Is there a relativistic mass?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Uncertainty principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Can't figure out why there's no radiaiton in the following trajectory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Gravity and torsion as Yang-Mills local gauge theory
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: Uncertainty principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around
  • From: Igor
• Re: SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Can't figure out why there's no radiaiton in the following trajectory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Eser
• Heisenberg insufficient for Einstein's main JOB was to merge micro and macro Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Stochastic Electrodynamics Theory states Electron orbits and ends Higgs Field
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Stochastic Electrodynamics Theory states Electron orbits and ends Higgs Field
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• SAD but "three" issues show Einstein was a PLAGIARIST.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: relativity is bifurcated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity is bifurcated
  • From: RLG
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: harry
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Still More Proof: Erica Gisse knows crap about Spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is it perfect math of what keeps the electrons from leaving an atom?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: harry
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: sal
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Quantum Geometry
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: relativity is bifurcated
  • From: RLG
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Quantum Gravity 177.0: Polynomials Identified As x -y Differences By Chinese
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: sal
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Yogurt
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Still More Proof: Erica Gisse knows crap about Spacetime
  • From: Shubee
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Is it perfect math of what keeps the electrons from leaving an atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Uncertainty principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Uncertainty principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Uncertain principle so uncertain they CHANGED their story around
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Path in Schwarzschild
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old
  • From: Igor
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: Igor
• Re: Biblical time table fot the destruction of Atheism
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Meaning of the spin connection coefficients & Lie algebra structure constants
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: Randy Poe
• The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: harry
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: harry
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Eser
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: harry
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Manufacturing Gateway Gothenburg, Sweden. 19-21 October 2007
  • From: Goteborgbank
• Re: Biblical time table fot the destruction of Atheism
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Biblical time table fot the destruction of Atheism
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: bz
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Still More Proof: Erica Gisse knows crap about Spacetime
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Synchrotron Radiation defies Heisenberg's Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Pmb
• Still More Proof: Erica Gisse knows crap about Spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Pmb
• why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: earth is practically 6 thousands years old
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: More Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: speeds higher than speed of light imposible not to exists
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why so few stars out there
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Science is Broken The Truth about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition
  • From: Igor
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle
  • From: Igor
• Reasoning detering Heinsenberg's principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Specialized Search Engines" along with Google Search Capability
  • From: prashant.thanki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: More Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Eser
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shuba
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Vern
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: bz
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: harry
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: harry
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Androcles
•           Science is Broken        The Truth about Relativity
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: RLG
• Re: More Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Proof: Madame Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Quantum Geometry
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: shuba
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shuba
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: PD
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: PD
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: PD
• Re: Variable inertia.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: harry
• Variable inertia.
  • From: Uwe Hayek
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: harry
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition
  • From: Igor
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: harry
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: dlzc
• More Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Proof: Missis Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Proof: Madame Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Eser
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: harry
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: harry
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Pmb
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Unified Field Theory in terms of Gravity proposition
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Geometry
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: harry
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Quantum Geometry
  • From: GravityQuantum
• Re: speeds higher than speed of light imposible not to exists
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: PD
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: PD
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: Igor
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Vern
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: PD
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Note to all the world.
  • From: meda
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Note to all the world.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Shubee
• Re: speeds higher than speed of light imposible not to exists
  • From: Josef Matz
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Eser
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: Jeckyl
• All dimensions are time vectors
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Dimensional analysis and measurement; what is the relativistic Hamiltonian?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Australia Telescope National Facility VLBI Network
  • From: tassotzioumis
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Stamenin
• johnreed math and universe Parts 3 and 4 September 11, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Disproving Einstein's General Relativity (GR)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and Astrology how are they related?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativity and Astrology how are they related?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Disproving Einstein's General Relativity (GR)
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Relativity and Astrology how are they related?
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: PD
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Eser
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: sal
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: harry
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Dimensional analysis and measurement; what is the relativistic Hamiltonian?
  • From: Juan R.
• Dimensional analysis and measurement; what is the relativistic Hamiltonian?
  • From: Juan R.
• Electrons must also be between shells(read 1st)?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Refraction must be 100% due to absorption and emission.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shuba
• Re: Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: Jeckyl
• Does a blue light beam get thicker during refraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Electron inside atom is particle otherwise no light reflection
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: harry
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: meda
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Jerry
• Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's idea is right
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's idea is right
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: another proof
  • From: PD
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: another proof
  • From: PD
• Re: another proof
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: another proof
  • From: PD
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: another proof
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: another proof
  • From: PD
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: Igor
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: Igor
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: Igor
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Igor
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: PD
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: how to define another universe, of other type
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Exclusion my ass, it's cause the magnetic moment is attractive
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Gravity"
  • From: Olp
• Heisenberg doesn't agree with orbits
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse doesn't know magnetic field tied to right hand rule.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: another proof
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: meda
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: meda
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: shuba
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Q re GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity extinct the bees
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: how to define another universe, of other type
  • From: xxein
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Erica Gisse doesn't know magnetic field tied to right hand rule.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Does Androcles have a theory?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does Androcles have a theory?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Erica Gisse doesn't know magnetic field tied to right hand rule.
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: Igor
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Igor
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: Igor
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Igor
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: sal
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity extinct the bees
  • From: sal
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: kk
• Re: Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups
  • From: dlzc
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: harry
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does Androcles have a theory?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Does Androcles have a theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does Androcles have a theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Jeckyl
• Does Androcles have a theory?
  • From: Alex
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Erica Gisse doesn't know magnetic field tied to right hand rule.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Alex
• Re: This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Alex
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Einstein's idea is right
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Q re GR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Q re GR
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Einstein's idea is right
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative Bill
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's idea is right
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: he can not do this
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is A Clock Second An Interval of Universal Time?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bernardz
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's idea is right
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: space is infinitely rigid
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: space is infinitely rigid
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Einstein's idea is right
  • From: xxein
• Re: WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: xxein
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: xxein
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: meda
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: meda
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: General Relativity, Going Strong at 92: Time Travel and Dark Energy
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: dlzc
• Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula
  • From: meda
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is A Clock Second An Interval of Universal Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Alex
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: relativity extinct the bees
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity extinct the bees
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: meda
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: meda
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: meda
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: meda
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Igor
• Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula
  • From: Igor
• Re: Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: Igor
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: Igor
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• spaces
  • From: Chris
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: meda
• Einstein's idea is right
  • From: Chris
• WHAT IS AN INERTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative
  • From: Igor
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Igor
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Igor
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: meda
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: meda
• Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is A Clock Second An Interval of Universal Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Is A Clock Second An Interval of Universal Time?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Electron a motionless atomic wave how absurd
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Do waves emit spectral lines
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: kenseto
• 2 silt experiment dumb cause electrons emit/receive radiowaves
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to Bake an Apple Pie!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Dono
• Erica Gisse argues with web links now
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: meda
• Re: How to Bake an Apple Pie!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• NEW Gravitational Time Dilation Formula
  • From: meda
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Shubee
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Olp
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: meda
• PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
  • From: meda
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: kk
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: he can not do this
  • From: Mdmeenken
• he can not do this
  • From: TechARTS
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How can a Black Hole be hollow?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: A Great Soap Opera!
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative Bill
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Evidence that Heisenberg's principle may be "CERTAIN"
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative Bill
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Igor
• Re: Evidence that Heisenberg's principle may be "CERTAIN"
  • From: Igor
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativistic Lagrangian and limitations of field theory
  • From: valls
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: dlzc
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: A Great Soap Opera!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: kk
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: meda
• Possible Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Evidence that Heisenberg's principle may be "CERTAIN"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: meda
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY you are not alone,
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Specialized search engine for: Physics, maths
  • From: prashant.thanki@xxxxxxxxx
• The "2" in the Schwarzschild Radius formula
  • From: meda
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Alex
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: bz
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Time dilation
  • From: aravamuthang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Missing Galaxy cluster Shadows and Huge CMB Voids seems to reason for a new raspberry shaped multiverse.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASA exposes Apollo Hoax
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: is light only a 2nd order model? why not more?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: is light only a 2nd order model? why not more?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: is light only a 2nd order model? why not more?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How can a Black Hole be hollow?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: why not video record all experiments?
  • From: sal
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: sal
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Randy refuses to acknowlege his own web link.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: sal
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy refuses to acknowlege his own web link.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Lying ignorant guskz refuses to look at the pictures
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randy refuses to acknowlege his own web link.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Randy refuses to acknowlege his own web link.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Randy refuses to acknowlege his own web link.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Aether?
  • From: harry
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: kenseto
• How to Bake an Apple Pie!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: John Park
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: Chris
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: bz
• Anyone know the distance between the two slits?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• If the double slit never permits the electron to combine?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: John Park
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New on 'Google Groups' : PS-R 8D
  • From: bz
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• New on 'Google Groups' : PS-R 8D
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SpaceTime & memory.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: where are the breakthroughs?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: where are the breakthroughs?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• No "fixed" atomic orbits does NOT mean the electron does not revovle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: relativity is a myth, another proof, this is big
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SpaceTime & memory.
  • From: bz
• Re: SpaceTime & memory.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: maxwell
• Re: SpaceTime & memory.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity extinct the bees
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity extinct the bees
  • From: sal
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Olp
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: 6 FACTS why Relativists are a bunch of liars
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: SpaceTime & memory.
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: John Park
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: PD
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: Mike Bass
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: bz
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SpaceTime & memory.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SpaceTime & memory.
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative
  • From: Igor
• SpaceTime & memory.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: relativity extinct the bees
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: another proof
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity.changed Science into science fiction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: YBM
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Why Time, space, motion are not relative
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativity.changed Science into science fiction
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Olc
• Relativity.changed Science into science fiction
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Why Time, space, motion are not relative
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: 6 FACTS why Relativists are a bunch of liars
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Strong gravitational fields
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Strong gravitational fields
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Strong gravitational fields
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Strong gravitational fields
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Barn-Pole Nuts & Bolts contradiction
  • From: sal
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Ann. Fond. Broglie
  • From: valeri
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: vanep
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: vanep
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: relativity extinct the bees
  • From: sal
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: another proof
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity is the dark age of science
  • From: bz
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Igor
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity is the dark age of science
  • From: Igor
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: harry
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wholesale / Sell Gucci Moon Bag @btbsell.com
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some Faulty Assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity is the dark age of science
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Is it theory A or theory B?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Olc
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Turn of the screw paradox/contradiction
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: relativity is the dark age of science
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: Is anti-time relative, too???
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: bz
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: relativity is the dark age of science
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: relativity is the dark age of science
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: RLG
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is the science for SR and LET?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: why not video record all experiments?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental facts contra relativizy in present form.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: eugene_stefanovich
• Re: Equivalence Principle Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: UFT via gauge by KST.
  • From: xxein
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Understanding Einstein
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Change in the Science of Relativity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where is the center of mass of two different size orbiting planets?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Atheism the worship of Complexity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What Does SR stand For?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: after 100 years of relativity
  • From: Androcles
• <spam>
  • From: JanPB