Re: SpaceTime & memory.
- From: "Thomas Heger" <hballo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:24:24 +0200
I admit my ideas about "time" are peculiar.
I reason "time" to require a "memory" to be
precieved and measured.
IOW's if one has no memory, I reason "time"
cannot exist in measurement or preception.
I had the same idea, saying "an object with no memory has no time".
That means: if an object cannot change or 'feel' a change, it makes no sense
to talk about time.
Therefore "time" is imaginary, tho not necessarily
requiring a sqrt(-1), but it was Minkowski's
SpaceTime that lead to this idea.
I think we can safely (we must) assume a rock or
an electron etc. are subject to the Principles of
Nature (PoN) , though clearly without having an
imagination.
I further reason the PoN are independant of our
imagination, and are therefore independant of
"time".
This is a step to far: our imagination is a description of nature. What we
describe with time is the evolution of big systems.
Very small systems (particles, quanta) do not need a time dependance.
This is why Im thinking of the need to develop background independent
quantum theorie (like LQG).
Time is to me a measure of entropie-change.
I think of tiny building blocks (quanta) combined to large systems (rocks,
planets, stars ...). The statistics of that evolution is what time
describes.
This causes me to extend General CovarianceI think of elementry systems as building block of our wourld.
to Frames of Reference that have no "time"
dimension, and therefore, treat the inclusion of
the "time" dimension as a Coordinate System
specialization for objects possessing memory,
like humans.
Systems are modelled as if they would have some 'intelligence'. Systems are
indipentent and know about the wourld only whats next to them or whats
within them.
If the system consists of more than one element, it is useful to talk about
time.
Since the quanta are quite stupid they dont know the principles of nature.
And there is no court to judge these laws of nature.
Since they have no memory, they imidiatly forget everything. This is why
they dont need or have a clock.
Thomas Heger
Best Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SpaceTime & memory.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: SpaceTime & memory.
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: SpaceTime & memory.
- References:
- SpaceTime & memory.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- SpaceTime & memory.
- Prev by Date: Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
- Next by Date: Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
- Previous by thread: Re: SpaceTime & memory.
- Next by thread: Re: SpaceTime & memory.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|