Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong



"JanPB" <filmart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
On Sep 6, 6:06 am, meda <a...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong

Here's the proof that the Schwarzschild Radius is wrong.

The formula for time dilation in respect to free space,
according to Relativity Theory (RT), and especially
for General Relativity (GR), is [1]:
factor = 1 - GravPotential / c^2
where
GravPotential = G*M/r

No, this is not what general relativity actually says for the very
simple reason that the notion of gravitational potential doesn't even
exist there. (Grav. potential is used only in approximations to
general relativity - these approximations can be used in certain cases
to simplify the calculations.)

Hence your entire argument stops dead right here. You are using a
Hollywood version of relativity, so you are getting a Hollywood
result.

We both know that I'm right, and you are wrong.
Above the Schwarzschild Radius was proven wrong,
and everything related to it.
If Mr. Schwarzschild back in 1916 used GR to get this
solution, and yes he indeed did, then he undoubtfully used
a wrong tool which gave him this wrong formula.
That simple and logical is the matter.

But you can prove what you say by showing us how
you calculate the gravitational time dilation.
Can you or can you not? That's the question...

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
    ... according to Relativity Theory, ... general relativity - these approximations can be used in certain cases ... My proof can be verified too, and it proves that Schwarzschild Radius ... you just use the usual blending tactics of "high maths" to cover the problem... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
    ... Here's the proof that the Schwarzschild Radius is wrong. ... according to Relativity Theory, ... If one believes in Relativity Theory then the ... And the correct formula for gravitational time dilation in respect ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
    ... according to Relativity Theory, ... general relativity - these approximations can be used in certain cases ... My proof can be verified too, and it proves that Schwarzschild Radius ... you just use the usual blending tactics of "high maths" to cover the problem... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Resubmitting Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
    ... cannot be derived from Field theory (or from General Relativity). ... singular and radiative potentials at a point x near the world line. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
    ... relativity is that time dilation will increase the nominal speed of ... of the earth is 200000km/sec in the frame in which the spaceship is at rest ... 'Relativity level' - A level of reality where length contraction and ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)

Loading