Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong

On Sep 9, 2:07 am, JanPB <film...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 8, 11:56 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is not true. The static, asymptotically flat, and spherically
symmetric solutions to the field equations in general take one such
form below.

I take this back. The following solution is only static and
spherically symmetric but not necessarily asymptotically flat.

ds^2 = c^2 dt^2 / (1 + K / R) - (1 + K / R) (dR/dr)^2 dr^2 - (R + K)^2
dO^2

Where

** R(r) = Function of r
** dO^2 = cos^2Phi dTheta^2 + dPhi^2
** K = Integration constant
** dr, dTheta, dPhi = Choiced coordinate system

Only if the following is true, you get the Schwarzschild metric.

** R = r - K

Where

** K = 2 G M / c^2

If the following is true, you get Schwarzschild's original solution
which does not manifest any black holes.

** R = (r^3 + K^3)^(1/3)

I have a correction. The original Schwarzschild's metric should be
the following.

** R = (r^3 + K^3)^(1/3) - K

If the following is true, you get another solution just as simple as
the Schwarzschild metric but without manifestation of black holes.

** R = r

If the following is true, you get a constantly expanding universe that
also obeys the Schwarzschild metric --- a trait that even the FLRW
metric fails to do so.

** R = r / (1 + r^2 / K / L)

Where

** L = Cosmic constant

If the following is true, you get an accelerated expanding universe.

** R = r / (1 + r^2 / K / L + r^3 / K / L / N)

Where

** L, N = Cosmic constants

Each of these solutions is uniquely independent of the others.
Claiming these solutions being the same is utter nonsense --- a
misunderstanding on your part of failure to understand the metric is
not a tensor but merely a matrix. In addition, the last two metrics
prove the Birkhoff's theorem wrong.

I'm not going to comment on your posting besides stating that almost
all of it is incorrect (both the mathematics and the history). We've
been through this before and there is little point in repeating it.

Just like before, you cannot explain why you are so fixated on the
Schwarzschild metric as the unique solution. You are just a priest.
You are telling the congregation which God is a preferably
worshipping. In reality according to the rules of mathematics, all
these solutions are independent of each other, and they are all
solutions to the field equations. <shrug> There are more, of course.

Just like before, you have no counter argument against what I have
brought us as the true history. As you said, it is all in the
archives. One just has to do some diligent research. <shrug>

More detail on Schwarzschild's derivation is found here (for those who
haven't been around at the previous iteration of Koobee's nonsensical
claims):
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/068e4e33d3f...

Still promoting that pure nonsense. This is physics. It is not about
which God is more powerful. <shrug>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
    ... elements of the metric are independent of O. <shrug> ... coordinate WAS ALREADY decided when the field equations WERE ... The metric _IS_ the geometry. ... These equations yield an infinite numbers of solutions (metrics) using ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
    ... Who care about what Lorentz and Poincare did? ... finally proposed the Voigt transform below as a modification of the ... The result is the set of Einstein field equations. ... degenerate to Newtonian law of gravity, all these three metrics above ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
    ... Who care about what Lorentz and Poincare did? ... finally proposed the Voigt transform below as a modification of the ... The result is the set of Einstein field equations. ... degenerate to Newtonian law of gravity, all these three metrics above ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
    ... If your know GR at all, you will find that GR does not require tensor ... Ricci did not know there is another set of connection coefficients ... Very soon after the introduction of the field equations, ... degenerate to Newtonian law of gravity, all these three metrics above ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
    ... Equation is only valid when the metric has a determinant of -1. ... Subsequent derivation of the Schwarzschild metric has been derived ... Both metrics ... Einstein's Field Equations are total nonsense. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading