Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:52:14 +1000
"Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1189398062.192665.227810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And so, what kind of evidence is there, for such a
physically impossible concept?
Careful your prejudice is showing again
What would be the
proper evidence for 4-D? It would have to be a test
that would give two different results, depending on
if it were 3-D or 4-D. Otherwise, it would not be
scientific. Therefore, it cannot be just something
that might be.
So .. good .. we get rid of LET and the ether .. as it cannot be just
something it might be
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- References:
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: RLG
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: PD
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: What Does SR stand For?
- Prev by Date: Re: PROOF: Schwarzschild Radius r=2*G*M/c^2 is wrong
- Next by Date: Re: Time dilation
- Previous by thread: Re: What Does SR stand For?
- Next by thread: Re: What Does SR stand For?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|