Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: "Pmb" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:30:04 -0400
"Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13f3ot51njjp177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Pmb" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Q_OdnfzPYab5Q2zbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13f3ko98fue3734@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Pmb" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
He claims that when we say that there is nothing in physics which would
make such a low-frequency photon impossible, ..
The main purpose of newsgroups such as this is to help people understand
the physics.
We've tried .. the valid physics has been carefully and unemtoinally
explained .. all we get back is insults. If he post physcis, I post
physcis only in return. I've not had to do that much lately.
Seems to me its time to terminate your responses to him doesn't it? I'm
curious as to why you respond to him at this point? I used to do the same
thing. I'm curious if it was for the same reasons.
that we talking about it is not sane or valid physics ..We can educate him can't we?
No. We've tried. Believe me .. you know what they say about old dogs
though :(
The trick is to give an example so simple that it is easily understood.
We'vetried all the tricks. If you think you have a new trick, then be my
guest ..
Nope. Far be it for me to say that I could do better my friend! :)
...you'll immediately be called a parot imbecil, theif crook bump parasite
psychopath.
I believe he did that and that's why I'm always hesitant to post in a thread
where he is posting. I can take anything except for insults. It makes me
think bad things about other people and a Christian shouldn't place himself
in that position.
... we can only talk about photons with frequencies 1Hz or more because
that is all we have measured. You've now said what appears to be
agreeing with him ...
I'm at a loss to understand how you came to that wrong conclusion. I was
agreeing with you and disagreeing with him.
I know how hs brain works .. he'll latch onto "It has nothing to do with
physics" and claim that you agree that such photons are not valid physics.
Oy Vey!
I'm happy to leave it alone .. he just keeps poisting over and over about
these 'superfarts'.
That's the point where I'd terminate my participation in that part of the
discussion in the thread.
Have you tried a graphical approach?
Difficulat in a text based newsgrup
You could do it like this
Origin What he believes is the lowest number
----|----------------|------------------------------------------------------>
|
|
Counter example
I don't think he is a 'thinking' person at all :):)
He uses that as justification for saying the all frequencies are a
multiples of some lowest possible frequency (which he was claiming to
be 1Hz at one stage)
Eeek! :)
Indeed
Porat has definitely insulted me in the past. But he's one to let bygones
to be bygones, or perhaps he simply forgets.
I'd go for that latter. There is no evidence of the former.
[snip interesting story]
Best wishes
Likewise
So how do you plan on dealing with him at this point, if I may ask of
course?
Best wishes
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- References:
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: Pmb
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- Prev by Date: Spin 1 vector torsion and curvature fields in substratum of geometrodynamics
- Next by Date: Re: why is so difficult to accept an absolute space
- Previous by thread: Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- Next by thread: Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
