Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!

On Sep 20, 5:30 am, "Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:13f3ot51njjp177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Q_OdnfzPYab5Q2zbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Jeckyl" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13f3ko98fue3734@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
He claims that when we say that there is nothing in physics which would
make such a low-frequency photon impossible, ..

The main purpose of newsgroups such as this is to help people understand
the physics.

We've tried .. the valid physics has been carefully and unemtoinally
explained .. all we get back is insults. If he post physcis, I post
physcis only in return. I've not had to do that much lately.

Seems to me its time to terminate your responses to him doesn't it? I'm
curious as to why you respond to him at this point? I used to do the same
thing. I'm curious if it was for the same reasons.

that we talking about it is not sane or valid physics ..
We can educate him can't we?

No. We've tried. Believe me .. you know what they say about old dogs
though :(

The trick is to give an example so simple that it is easily understood.

We'vetried all the tricks. If you think you have a new trick, then be my
guest ..

Nope. Far be it for me to say that I could do better my friend! :)

...you'll immediately be called a parot imbecil, theif crook bump parasite
psychopath.

I believe he did that and that's why I'm always hesitant to post in a thread
where he is posting. I can take anything except for insults. It makes me
think bad things about other people and a Christian shouldn't place himself
in that position.



... we can only talk about photons with frequencies 1Hz or more because
that is all we have measured. You've now said what appears to be
agreeing with him ...

I'm at a loss to understand how you came to that wrong conclusion. I was
agreeing with you and disagreeing with him.

I know how hs brain works .. he'll latch onto "It has nothing to do with
physics" and claim that you agree that such photons are not valid physics.

Oy Vey!

I'm happy to leave it alone .. he just keeps poisting over and over about
these 'superfarts'.

That's the point where I'd terminate my participation in that part of the
discussion in the thread.

Have you tried a graphical approach?

Difficulat in a text based newsgrup

You could do it like this

Origin What he believes is the lowest number
----|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------­->
|
|
Counter example





I don't think he is a 'thinking' person at all :):)

He uses that as justification for saying the all frequencies are a
multiples of some lowest possible frequency (which he was claiming to
be 1Hz at one stage)

Eeek! :)

Indeed

Porat has definitely insulted me in the past. But he's one to let bygones
to be bygones, or perhaps he simply forgets.

I'd go for that latter. There is no evidence of the former.

[snip interesting story]

Best wishes

Likewise

So how do you plan on dealing with him at this point, if I may ask of
course?

Best wishes

Pete- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

-----------------

Mr Pete
did you came to physics through mathematicas???
forst of all
no sane person will insist endlessly to educate
another one
who gave you or mat be betetr Jekyle
the insane arrogance that he understands physics
betetr than others
2
lets be more specific:

he brought anabstract possibility example
of a n observwer sitting in a second frame S'
that is traveling in a counter direction
versus a moving photon
in a velocity 'close to c' !!!
that is the difference between a mathematician
and a physicist !!!

because no measuring system in reality
weill travel in a velocity close to c !!!
and you will **never**get such a system!!
so jekyle is talking about something
that is only in his sick mind!!
there is a diffrence between mathematical speculations
AND REALITY !!! GOT IT
physics is a science of reality not of immagiantion
thatr is the difference between
scince and science fiction!!!

in reality you willnever find a photon with
one cycle per 100 billin yeras
for me it is a shame and insult to the intelligence
of a physicsit
even to deal withsuch anidiotic issue !!

no tto mension that our univers is 'only' about 15 bi,,ion
years old !!
and you have no theoretic chance
tofolow a phjoton with such a wave length
in short Mr Pmb
just tell u s loud and clear:
do you support now the idea
of a photon of one cycle per 100 billion years
as valid physics ??!!!
(let us heat what is a man that defines himself
as a honest (sane ) Christian say ....)

TIA only to Pmb
Y.Porat
-----------------------------------
Y.Porat
------------------------------------

take the 'explama

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Light & Matter:Two Modes of the Same Thing.
    ... >then I expect you used some new ``REALITY MATH''. ... Physics, that the Comptin Frequency of the photon is exactly equal to the ... is loaded down with the "rest mass energy" equal to the Proton. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
    ... for sound reasons states that the energy W of a photon ... Plus the relation between mass and energy ... education in physics. ... that is not the definition of aether. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: mass of the photon
    ... Introduction to High Energy Physics, by Donald Perkins, especially ... areas such as particle physics. ... the energy required for pair production of teh positron and electron. ... 'Balmer-like' analytic solution to the spectroscopy of the photon ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Winds of change
    ... It provides a photon ... The amount of charge on an electron ... Thermal speeds of hot stars are generally greater than their ... >interpretation is unnecessary in physics theories. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
    ... It has no relationship to physics until ... >transformations between inertial observers form the Galilei group. ... >> doesn't seem to have any relationship to a photon in the usual sense. ... That is not consistent with your claim that lorentz transforms ...
    (sci.physics)